| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2018 20:02:42 +0800
From: Jisheng Zhang <Jisheng.Zhang@...aptics.com>
To: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Marek Behún <marek.behun@....cz>,
Tomas Hlavacek <tomas.hlavacek@....cz>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] net: mvneta: use the correct napi pointer
if neta_armada3700 is true, the mvneta_pcpu_port's napi is invalid, we
should use pp->napi instead. Fix mvneta_config_rss() with this method.
Although we can fix mvneta_rx_hwbm() and mvneta_rx_swbm() in the same
manner, the napi parm of mvneta_poll() is always correct, so we can
pass the correct napi param to mvneta_rx_hwbm() and mvneta_rx_swbm()
Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <Jisheng.Zhang@...aptics.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c | 55 ++++++++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c
index 0ad2f3f7da85..74b701fed5ef 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c
@@ -1901,10 +1901,9 @@ static void mvneta_rxq_drop_pkts(struct mvneta_port *pp,
}
/* Main rx processing when using software buffer management */
-static int mvneta_rx_swbm(struct mvneta_port *pp, int rx_todo,
- struct mvneta_rx_queue *rxq)
+static int mvneta_rx_swbm(struct mvneta_port *pp, struct napi_struct *napi,
+ int rx_todo, struct mvneta_rx_queue *rxq)
{
- struct mvneta_pcpu_port *port = this_cpu_ptr(pp->ports);
struct net_device *dev = pp->dev;
int rx_done;
u32 rcvd_pkts = 0;
@@ -1959,7 +1958,7 @@ static int mvneta_rx_swbm(struct mvneta_port *pp, int rx_todo,
skb->protocol = eth_type_trans(skb, dev);
mvneta_rx_csum(pp, rx_status, skb);
- napi_gro_receive(&port->napi, skb);
+ napi_gro_receive(napi, skb);
rcvd_pkts++;
rcvd_bytes += rx_bytes;
@@ -2001,7 +2000,7 @@ static int mvneta_rx_swbm(struct mvneta_port *pp, int rx_todo,
mvneta_rx_csum(pp, rx_status, skb);
- napi_gro_receive(&port->napi, skb);
+ napi_gro_receive(napi, skb);
}
if (rcvd_pkts) {
@@ -2020,10 +2019,9 @@ static int mvneta_rx_swbm(struct mvneta_port *pp, int rx_todo,
}
/* Main rx processing when using hardware buffer management */
-static int mvneta_rx_hwbm(struct mvneta_port *pp, int rx_todo,
- struct mvneta_rx_queue *rxq)
+static int mvneta_rx_hwbm(struct mvneta_port *pp, struct napi_struct *napi,
+ int rx_todo, struct mvneta_rx_queue *rxq)
{
- struct mvneta_pcpu_port *port = this_cpu_ptr(pp->ports);
struct net_device *dev = pp->dev;
int rx_done;
u32 rcvd_pkts = 0;
@@ -2085,7 +2083,7 @@ static int mvneta_rx_hwbm(struct mvneta_port *pp, int rx_todo,
skb->protocol = eth_type_trans(skb, dev);
mvneta_rx_csum(pp, rx_status, skb);
- napi_gro_receive(&port->napi, skb);
+ napi_gro_receive(napi, skb);
rcvd_pkts++;
rcvd_bytes += rx_bytes;
@@ -2129,7 +2127,7 @@ static int mvneta_rx_hwbm(struct mvneta_port *pp, int rx_todo,
mvneta_rx_csum(pp, rx_status, skb);
- napi_gro_receive(&port->napi, skb);
+ napi_gro_receive(napi, skb);
}
if (rcvd_pkts) {
@@ -2722,9 +2720,11 @@ static int mvneta_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
if (rx_queue) {
rx_queue = rx_queue - 1;
if (pp->bm_priv)
- rx_done = mvneta_rx_hwbm(pp, budget, &pp->rxqs[rx_queue]);
+ rx_done = mvneta_rx_hwbm(pp, napi, budget,
+ &pp->rxqs[rx_queue]);
else
- rx_done = mvneta_rx_swbm(pp, budget, &pp->rxqs[rx_queue]);
+ rx_done = mvneta_rx_swbm(pp, napi, budget,
+ &pp->rxqs[rx_queue]);
}
if (rx_done < budget) {
@@ -4018,13 +4018,18 @@ static int mvneta_config_rss(struct mvneta_port *pp)
on_each_cpu(mvneta_percpu_mask_interrupt, pp, true);
- /* We have to synchronise on the napi of each CPU */
- for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
- struct mvneta_pcpu_port *pcpu_port =
- per_cpu_ptr(pp->ports, cpu);
+ if (!pp->neta_armada3700) {
+ /* We have to synchronise on the napi of each CPU */
+ for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
+ struct mvneta_pcpu_port *pcpu_port =
+ per_cpu_ptr(pp->ports, cpu);
- napi_synchronize(&pcpu_port->napi);
- napi_disable(&pcpu_port->napi);
+ napi_synchronize(&pcpu_port->napi);
+ napi_disable(&pcpu_port->napi);
+ }
+ } else {
+ napi_synchronize(&pp->napi);
+ napi_disable(&pp->napi);
}
pp->rxq_def = pp->indir[0];
@@ -4041,12 +4046,16 @@ static int mvneta_config_rss(struct mvneta_port *pp)
mvneta_percpu_elect(pp);
spin_unlock(&pp->lock);
- /* We have to synchronise on the napi of each CPU */
- for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
- struct mvneta_pcpu_port *pcpu_port =
- per_cpu_ptr(pp->ports, cpu);
+ if (!pp->neta_armada3700) {
+ /* We have to synchronise on the napi of each CPU */
+ for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
+ struct mvneta_pcpu_port *pcpu_port =
+ per_cpu_ptr(pp->ports, cpu);
- napi_enable(&pcpu_port->napi);
+ napi_enable(&pcpu_port->napi);
+ }
+ } else {
+ napi_enable(&pp->napi);
}
netif_tx_start_all_queues(pp->dev);
--
2.18.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists