lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180809124726.GA9500@kroah.com>
Date:   Thu, 9 Aug 2018 14:47:26 +0200
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     maowenan <maowenan@...wei.com>
Cc:     David Woodhouse <dwmw@...zon.co.uk>, davem@...emloft.net,
        edumazet@...gle.com, juha-matti.tilli@....fi, ycheng@...gle.com,
        soheil@...gle.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, eric.dumazet@...il.com,
        dwmw2@...radead.org, jdw@...zon.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.9-stable] tcp: add tcp_ooo_try_coalesce() helper

On Thu, Aug 09, 2018 at 08:37:13PM +0800, maowenan wrote:
> 
> 
> On 2018/8/7 21:22, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 04, 2018 at 10:10:00AM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> >> From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
> >>
> >> commit 58152ecbbcc6a0ce7fddd5bf5f6ee535834ece0c upstream.
> >>
> >> In case skb in out_or_order_queue is the result of
> >> multiple skbs coalescing, we would like to get a proper gso_segs
> >> counter tracking, so that future tcp_drop() can report an accurate
> >> number.
> >>
> >> I chose to not implement this tracking for skbs in receive queue,
> >> since they are not dropped, unless socket is disconnected.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
> >> Acked-by: Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil@...gle.com>
> >> Acked-by: Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@...gle.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
> >> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw@...zon.co.uk>
> >> ---
> >>  net/ipv4/tcp_input.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++--
> >>  1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > Now applied, thanks,
> > 
> > greg k-h
> > 
> > .
> > 
> 
> Hello,
> 
> There are two patches in stable branch linux-4.4, but I have tested with below patches, and found that the cpu usage was very high.
> dc6ae4d tcp: detect malicious patterns in tcp_collapse_ofo_queue()
> 5fbec48 tcp: avoid collapses in tcp_prune_queue() if possible
> 
> test results:
> with fix patch: 78.2%   ksoftirqd
> no fix patch:   90%     ksoftirqd
> 
> there is %0 when no attack packets.
> 
> so please help verify that fixed patches are enough in linux-stable 4.4.
> 

I do not know, I am not a network developer.  Please try to reproduce
the same thing on a newer kernel release and see if the result is the
same or not.  If you can find a change that I missed, please let me know
and I will be glad to apply it.

thnaks,

greg k-h

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ