netdev - Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH next-queue 0/8] ixgbe/ixgbevf: IPsec offload support for VFs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5ff4527d-7557-10f4-f41e-3e618f0e5863@oracle.com>
Date:   Tue, 14 Aug 2018 10:10:54 -0700
From:   Shannon Nelson <shannon.nelson@...cle.com>
To:     Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>
Cc:     intel-wired-lan <intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>,
        Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
        Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>,
        Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH next-queue 0/8] ixgbe/ixgbevf: IPsec
 offload support for VFs

On 8/14/2018 8:30 AM, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 11:43 AM Shannon Nelson
> <shannon.nelson@...cle.com> wrote:
>>
>> This set of patches implements IPsec hardware offload for VF devices in
>> Intel's 10Gbe x540 family of Ethernet devices.

[...]

> 
> So the one question I would have about this patch set is what happens
> if you are setting up a ipsec connection between the PF and one of the
> VFs on the same port/function? Do the ipsec offloads get translated
> across the Tx loopback or do they end up causing issues? Specifically
> I would be interested in seeing the results of a test either between
> two VFs, or the PF and one of the VFs on the same port.
> 
> - Alex
> 

There is definitely something funky in the internal switch connection, 
as messages going from PF to VF with an offloaded encryption don't seem 
to get received by the VF, at least when in a VEB setup.  If I only set 
up offloads on the Rx on both PF and VF, and don't offload the Tx, then 
things work.

I don't have a setup to test this, but I suspect that in a VEPA 
configuration, with packets going out to the switch and turned around 
back in, the Tx encryption offload would happen as expected.

sln