netdev - Re: [PATCH bpf] bpf: fix a rcu usage warning in bpf_prog_array_copy

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 15 Aug 2018 14:37:52 -0700
From:   Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>
To:     Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
CC:     Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>, <ast@...com>, <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <kernel-team@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf] bpf: fix a rcu usage warning in
 bpf_prog_array_copy_core()

On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 02:30:11PM -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 05:08:44PM -0700, Roman Gushchin wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 04:59:45PM -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> > > On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 11:01:12AM -0700, Yonghong Song wrote:
> > > > Commit 394e40a29788 ("bpf: extend bpf_prog_array to store pointers
> > > > to the cgroup storage") refactored the bpf_prog_array_copy_core()
> > > > to accommodate new structure bpf_prog_array_item which contains
> > > > bpf_prog array itself.
> > > > 
> > > > In the old code, we had
> > > >    perf_event_query_prog_array():
> > > >      mutex_lock(...)
> > > >      bpf_prog_array_copy_call():
> > > >        prog = rcu_dereference_check(array, 1)->progs
> > > >        bpf_prog_array_copy_core(prog, ...)
> > > >      mutex_unlock(...)
> > > > 
> > > > With the above commit, we had
> > > >    perf_event_query_prog_array():
> > > >      mutex_lock(...)
> > > >      bpf_prog_array_copy_call():
> > > >        bpf_prog_array_copy_core(array, ...):
> > > >          item = rcu_dereference(array)->items;
> > > >          ...
> > > >      mutex_unlock(...)
> > > > 
> > > > The new code will trigger a lockdep rcu checking warning.
> > > > The fix is to change rcu_dereference() to rcu_dereference_check()
> > > > to prevent such a warning.
> > > > 
> > > > Reported-by: syzbot+6e72317008eef84a216b@...kaller.appspotmail.com
> > > > Fixes: 394e40a29788 ("bpf: extend bpf_prog_array to store pointers to the cgroup storage")
> > > > Cc: Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>
> > > 
> > > makes sense to me
> > > Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
> > > 
> > > Roman, would you agree?
> > > 
> > 
> > rcu_dereference_check(<>, 1) always looks a bit strange to me,
> > but if it's the only reasonable way to silence the warning,
> > of course I'm fine with it.
> 
> do you have better suggestion?
> This patch is a fix for the regression introduced in your earlier patch,
> so I think the only fair path forward is either to Ack it or
> to send an alternative patch asap.
> 

As I said, I've nothing against.

Acked-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>

Thanks!