netdev - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the crypto tree with the net-next tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180815131246.67214bdf@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:   Wed, 15 Aug 2018 13:12:46 +1000
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the crypto tree with the net-next
 tree

Hi all,

On Mon, 30 Jul 2018 13:22:53 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the crypto tree got conflicts in:
> 
>   drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c
>   drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fs_enet/mac-fec.c
> 
> between commits:
> 
>   16f6e9835bcd ("net: ethernet: freescale: Use generic CRC32 implementation")
>   d805f6a86829 ("net: ethernet: fs-enet: Use generic CRC32 implementation")
> 
> from the net-next tree and commit:
> 
>   5d258b48efbd ("net: ethernet: Use existing define with polynomial")
> 
> from the crypto tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (I used the net-next tree versions (but kept the rmeoval
> of the CRC32_POLY and FEC_CRC_POLY defines) and can carry the fix as
> necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any
> non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer
> when your tree is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider
> cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any
> particularly complex conflicts.

This is now a conflict between the crypto-current tree and the net-next
tree.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped