[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACK8Z6GbNozvdyrXdZyBEKKMC-U=puggpaPzMRWF0MAqC0Lf_g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2018 17:05:23 -0700
From: Rajat Jain <rajatja@...gle.com>
To: sfr@...b.auug.org.au
Cc: greg@...ah.com, davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the driver-core tree with the
net-next tree
On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 4:43 PM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> On Mon, 23 Jul 2018 08:20:46 +0200 Greg KH <greg@...ah.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 03:12:24PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > >
> > > Today's linux-next merge of the driver-core tree got a conflict in:
> > >
> > > fs/sysfs/group.c
> > >
> > > between commit:
> > >
> > > 5f81880d5204 ("sysfs, kobject: allow creating kobject belonging to arbitrary users")
> > >
> > > from the net-next tree and commit:
> > >
> > > c855cf2759d2 ("sysfs: Fix internal_create_group() for named group updates")
> > >
> > > from the driver-core tree.
> > >
> > > I fixed it up (I think - see below) and can carry the fix as
> > > necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any
> > > non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer
> > > when your tree is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider
> > > cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any
> > > particularly complex conflicts.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Cheers,
> > > Stephen Rothwell
> > >
> > > diff --cc fs/sysfs/group.c
> > > index c7a716c4acc9,38240410f831..000000000000
> > > --- a/fs/sysfs/group.c
> > > +++ b/fs/sysfs/group.c
> > > @@@ -122,15 -118,23 +122,24 @@@ static int internal_create_group(struc
> > > kobj->name, grp->name ?: "");
> > > return -EINVAL;
> > > }
> > > + kobject_get_ownership(kobj, &uid, &gid);
> > > if (grp->name) {
> > > - kn = kernfs_create_dir_ns(kobj->sd, grp->name,
> > > - S_IRWXU | S_IRUGO | S_IXUGO,
> > > - uid, gid, kobj, NULL);
> > > - if (IS_ERR(kn)) {
> > > - if (PTR_ERR(kn) == -EEXIST)
> > > - sysfs_warn_dup(kobj->sd, grp->name);
> > > - return PTR_ERR(kn);
> > > + if (update) {
> > > + kn = kernfs_find_and_get(kobj->sd, grp->name);
> > > + if (!kn) {
> > > + pr_warn("Can't update unknown attr grp name: %s/%s\n",
> > > + kobj->name, grp->name);
> > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > + }
> > > + } else {
> > > - kn = kernfs_create_dir(kobj->sd, grp->name,
> > > - S_IRWXU | S_IRUGO | S_IXUGO,
> > > - kobj);
> > > ++ kn = kernfs_create_dir_ns(kobj->sd, grp->name,
> > > ++ S_IRWXU | S_IRUGO | S_IXUGO,
> > > ++ uid, gid, kobj, NULL);
> > > + if (IS_ERR(kn)) {
> > > + if (PTR_ERR(kn) == -EEXIST)
> > > + sysfs_warn_dup(kobj->sd, grp->name);
> > > + return PTR_ERR(kn);
> > > + }
> > > }
> > > } else
> > > kn = kobj->sd;
> >
> >
> > I think this is correct. Rajat, can you verify it please?
Sorry, I saw this very late. Yes, this is correct.
>
>
> This is now a conflict between Linus' tree and the driver-core tree.
Greg, please let me know if there is anything I need to do about this.
Thanks & Best Regards,
Rajat
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
Powered by blists - more mailing lists