netdev - Re: [offlist] Re: Crash in netlink/sk_filter_trim

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5ee111e1-1ee5-d9e4-9915-283f98204d16@iogearbox.net>
Date:   Sat, 18 Aug 2018 00:06:02 +0200
From:   Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To:     Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@...il.com>
Cc:     Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Marc Haber <mh+netdev@...schlus.de>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        labbott@...hat.com, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [offlist] Re: Crash in netlink/sk_filter_trim_cap on ARMv7 on
 4.18rc1

On 08/17/2018 11:13 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 7:30 PM, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net> wrote:
>> On 08/17/2018 06:17 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>>> On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 02:40:19PM +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
>>>> I'd have one potential bug suspicion, for the 4.18 one you were trying,
>>>> could you run with the below patch to see whether it would help?
>>>
>>> I think this is almost certainly the problem - looking at the history,
>>> it seems that the "-4" was assumed to be part of the scratch stuff in
>>> commit 38ca93060163 ("bpf, arm32: save 4 bytes of unneeded stack space")
>>> but it isn't - it's because "off" of zero refers to the top word in the
>>> stack (iow at STACK_SIZE-4).
>>
>> Yeah agree, my thinking as well (albeit bit late, sigh, sorry about that).
>> Waiting for Peter to get back with results for definite confirmation. Your
>> rework in 1c35ba122d4a ("ARM: net: bpf: use negative numbers for stacked
>> registers") and 96cced4e774a ("ARM: net: bpf: access eBPF scratch space using
>> ARM FP register") fixes this in mainline, so unless I'm missing something this
>> would only need a stand-alone fix for 4.18/stable which I can cook up and
>> submit then.
> 
> I can confirm that fixes the problems I was seeing on Fedora 29.
> 
> Feel free to add a tested by from me:
> 
> Tested-by: Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@...il.com>

Great, thanks everyone! Will get it out asap.