[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <edc2f14f-8694-3160-47b1-ccb5be8a3484@mleia.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2018 18:29:01 +0300
From: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@...ia.com>
To: zhong jiang <zhongjiang@...wei.com>, davem@...emloft.net
Cc: slemieux.tyco@...il.com, keescook@...omium.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ethernet: lpc_eth: Use NULL to compare with
pointer-typed value rather than 0
Hi zhong jiang,
On 08/17/2018 04:18 PM, zhong jiang wrote:
> We should use NULL to compare with pointer-typed value rather than 0.
> The issue is detected with the help of Coccinelle.
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/nxp/lpc_eth.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/nxp/lpc_eth.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/nxp/lpc_eth.c
> index 08381ef..04d9e62 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/nxp/lpc_eth.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/nxp/lpc_eth.c
> @@ -1350,7 +1350,7 @@ static int lpc_eth_drv_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> "IRAM not big enough for net buffers, using SDRAM instead.\n");
> }
>
> - if (pldat->dma_buff_base_v == 0) {
> + if (pldat->dma_buff_base_v == NULL) {
That's a valid finding, but please use a common 0 and NULL comparison in form of
if (!pldat->dma_buff_base_v)
To the change above please feel free to add my
Acked-by: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@...ia.com>
> ret = dma_coerce_mask_and_coherent(&pdev->dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32));
> if (ret)
> goto err_out_free_irq;
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists