[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180820145415.GA5310@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2018 11:54:15 -0300
From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>
To: Vladislav Yasevich <vyasevich@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
virtio-dev@...ts.oasis-open.org, mst@...hat.com,
jasowang@...hat.com, nhorman@...driver.com,
Vladislav Yasevich <vyasevic@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 net-next 2/6] sctp: Handle sctp packets with
CHECKSUM_PARTIAL
On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 11:38:24AM -0300, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:
> On Tue, May 01, 2018 at 10:07:35PM -0400, Vladislav Yasevich wrote:
> > With SCTP checksum offload available in virtio, it is now
> > possible for virtio to receive a sctp packet with CHECKSUM_PARTIAL
> > set (guest-to-guest traffic). SCTP doesn't really have a
> > partial checksum like TCP does, because CRC32c can't do partial
> > additive checksumming. It's all or nothing. So an SCTP packet
> > with CHECKSUM_PARTIAL will have checksum set to 0. Let SCTP
> > treat this as a valid checksum if CHECKSUM_PARTIAL is set.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Vladislav Yasevich <vyasevic@...hat.com>
> > ---
> > net/sctp/input.c | 11 ++++++++++-
> > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/net/sctp/input.c b/net/sctp/input.c
> > index ba8a6e6..055b8ffa 100644
> > --- a/net/sctp/input.c
> > +++ b/net/sctp/input.c
> > @@ -80,8 +80,17 @@ static inline int sctp_rcv_checksum(struct net *net, struct sk_buff *skb)
> > {
> > struct sctphdr *sh = sctp_hdr(skb);
> > __le32 cmp = sh->checksum;
> > - __le32 val = sctp_compute_cksum(skb, 0);
> > + __le32 val = 0;
> >
> > + /* In sctp PARTIAL checksum is always 0. This is a case of
> > + * a packet received from guest that supports checksum offload.
> > + * Assume it's correct as there is really no way to verify,
> > + * and we want to avaoid computing it unnecesarily.
> nit, typos --^ --^
Hi Vlad. Seems this patchset got stuck because of these.
The only other subthread that is left is actually about SCTP GSO,
which is not directly related to this.
Marcelo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists