[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOMZO5AkVNiYMGdED9erL=YMaKcmtS5BzZxw2gO1KLXEaPnD7A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2018 19:45:24 -0300
From: Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>,
Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@...b.com>
Cc: Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...il.com>,
Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@...ndegger.com>,
Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, linux-can@...r.kernel.org,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/11] can: rcar: use SPDX identifier for Renesas drivers
Hi Wolfram,
On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 7:02 PM, Wolfram Sang
<wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com> wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>
> ---
>
> To be applied individually per subsystem tree. Morimoto-san, could you maybe
> ack this with your Renesas address?
>
> drivers/net/can/rcar/rcar_can.c | 6 +-----
> drivers/net/can/rcar/rcar_canfd.c | 6 +-----
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/can/rcar/rcar_can.c b/drivers/net/can/rcar/rcar_can.c
> index 11662f479e76..051bf4ef4be2 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/can/rcar/rcar_can.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/can/rcar/rcar_can.c
> @@ -1,12 +1,8 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
According to Documentation/process/license-rules.rst the format should
be like this instead:
// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
Powered by blists - more mailing lists