| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <24f10821-a07e-e0cd-0266-b33856e7d88a@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2018 08:45:00 +0800
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
To: xiangxia.m.yue@...il.com, mst@...hat.com,
makita.toshiaki@....ntt.co.jp
Cc: virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v8 5/7] net: vhost: introduce bitmap for
vhost_poll
On 2018年08月19日 20:11, xiangxia.m.yue@...il.com wrote:
> From: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue@...il.com>
>
> The bitmap of vhost_dev can help us to check if the
> specified poll is scheduled. This patch will be used
> for next two patches.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/vhost/net.c | 11 +++++++++--
> drivers/vhost/vhost.c | 17 +++++++++++++++--
> drivers/vhost/vhost.h | 7 ++++++-
> 3 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/net.c b/drivers/vhost/net.c
> index 1eff72d..23d7ffc 100644
> --- a/drivers/vhost/net.c
> +++ b/drivers/vhost/net.c
> @@ -1135,8 +1135,15 @@ static int vhost_net_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *f)
> }
> vhost_dev_init(dev, vqs, VHOST_NET_VQ_MAX);
>
> - vhost_poll_init(n->poll + VHOST_NET_VQ_TX, handle_tx_net, EPOLLOUT, dev);
> - vhost_poll_init(n->poll + VHOST_NET_VQ_RX, handle_rx_net, EPOLLIN, dev);
> + vhost_poll_init(n->poll + VHOST_NET_VQ_TX,
> + handle_tx_net,
> + VHOST_NET_VQ_TX,
> + EPOLLOUT, dev);
> +
> + vhost_poll_init(n->poll + VHOST_NET_VQ_RX,
> + handle_rx_net,
> + VHOST_NET_VQ_RX,
> + EPOLLIN, dev);
>
> f->private_data = n;
>
> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
> index a1c06e7..dc88a60 100644
> --- a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
> +++ b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
> @@ -186,7 +186,7 @@ void vhost_work_init(struct vhost_work *work, vhost_work_fn_t fn)
>
> /* Init poll structure */
> void vhost_poll_init(struct vhost_poll *poll, vhost_work_fn_t fn,
> - __poll_t mask, struct vhost_dev *dev)
> + __u8 poll_id, __poll_t mask, struct vhost_dev *dev)
> {
> init_waitqueue_func_entry(&poll->wait, vhost_poll_wakeup);
> init_poll_funcptr(&poll->table, vhost_poll_func);
> @@ -194,6 +194,7 @@ void vhost_poll_init(struct vhost_poll *poll, vhost_work_fn_t fn,
> poll->dev = dev;
> poll->wqh = NULL;
>
> + poll->poll_id = poll_id;
> vhost_work_init(&poll->work, fn);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vhost_poll_init);
> @@ -276,8 +277,16 @@ bool vhost_has_work(struct vhost_dev *dev)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vhost_has_work);
>
> +bool vhost_has_work_pending(struct vhost_dev *dev, int poll_id)
> +{
> + return !llist_empty(&dev->work_list) &&
> + test_bit(poll_id, dev->work_pending);
I think we've already had something similar. E.g can we test
VHOST_WORK_QUEUED instead?
Thanks
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vhost_has_work_pending);
> +
> void vhost_poll_queue(struct vhost_poll *poll)
> {
> + set_bit(poll->poll_id, poll->dev->work_pending);
> vhost_work_queue(poll->dev, &poll->work);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vhost_poll_queue);
> @@ -354,6 +363,7 @@ static int vhost_worker(void *data)
> if (!node)
> schedule();
>
> + bitmap_zero(dev->work_pending, VHOST_DEV_MAX_VQ);
> node = llist_reverse_order(node);
> /* make sure flag is seen after deletion */
> smp_wmb();
> @@ -420,6 +430,8 @@ void vhost_dev_init(struct vhost_dev *dev,
> struct vhost_virtqueue *vq;
> int i;
>
> + BUG_ON(nvqs > VHOST_DEV_MAX_VQ);
> +
> dev->vqs = vqs;
> dev->nvqs = nvqs;
> mutex_init(&dev->mutex);
> @@ -428,6 +440,7 @@ void vhost_dev_init(struct vhost_dev *dev,
> dev->iotlb = NULL;
> dev->mm = NULL;
> dev->worker = NULL;
> + bitmap_zero(dev->work_pending, VHOST_DEV_MAX_VQ);
> init_llist_head(&dev->work_list);
> init_waitqueue_head(&dev->wait);
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dev->read_list);
> @@ -445,7 +458,7 @@ void vhost_dev_init(struct vhost_dev *dev,
> vhost_vq_reset(dev, vq);
> if (vq->handle_kick)
> vhost_poll_init(&vq->poll, vq->handle_kick,
> - EPOLLIN, dev);
> + i, EPOLLIN, dev);
> }
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vhost_dev_init);
> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vhost.h b/drivers/vhost/vhost.h
> index 6c844b9..60b6f6d 100644
> --- a/drivers/vhost/vhost.h
> +++ b/drivers/vhost/vhost.h
> @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ struct vhost_poll {
> wait_queue_head_t *wqh;
> wait_queue_entry_t wait;
> struct vhost_work work;
> + __u8 poll_id;
> __poll_t mask;
> struct vhost_dev *dev;
> };
> @@ -37,9 +38,10 @@ struct vhost_poll {
> void vhost_work_init(struct vhost_work *work, vhost_work_fn_t fn);
> void vhost_work_queue(struct vhost_dev *dev, struct vhost_work *work);
> bool vhost_has_work(struct vhost_dev *dev);
> +bool vhost_has_work_pending(struct vhost_dev *dev, int poll_id);
>
> void vhost_poll_init(struct vhost_poll *poll, vhost_work_fn_t fn,
> - __poll_t mask, struct vhost_dev *dev);
> + __u8 id, __poll_t mask, struct vhost_dev *dev);
> int vhost_poll_start(struct vhost_poll *poll, struct file *file);
> void vhost_poll_stop(struct vhost_poll *poll);
> void vhost_poll_flush(struct vhost_poll *poll);
> @@ -152,6 +154,8 @@ struct vhost_msg_node {
> struct list_head node;
> };
>
> +#define VHOST_DEV_MAX_VQ 128
> +
> struct vhost_dev {
> struct mm_struct *mm;
> struct mutex mutex;
> @@ -159,6 +163,7 @@ struct vhost_dev {
> int nvqs;
> struct eventfd_ctx *log_ctx;
> struct llist_head work_list;
> + DECLARE_BITMAP(work_pending, VHOST_DEV_MAX_VQ);
> struct task_struct *worker;
> struct vhost_umem *umem;
> struct vhost_umem *iotlb;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists