[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOMZO5BiAyDMSR=2Y-4-1ftNuVtRS59sSJd_cdFmzX=0kgF0Bw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2018 09:55:17 -0300
From: Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@...b.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>,
Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...il.com>,
Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@...ndegger.com>,
Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, linux-can@...r.kernel.org,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/11] can: rcar: use SPDX identifier for Renesas drivers
On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 3:30 AM, Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de> wrote:
>
>> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
>>
>> According to Documentation/process/license-rules.rst the format should
>> be like this instead:
>>
>> // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
>
> According to https://spdx.org/licenses/ it should be what I did above.
Previous advice I saw was to follow the format described in
Documentation/process/license-rules.rst
Greg/Philippe,
Any inputs on this matter?
Thanks
Powered by blists - more mailing lists