lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 24 Aug 2018 11:20:35 +0300
From:   Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
To:     Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@...hat.com>
Cc:     Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo.bianconi@...hat.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mt76: Fix comparisons with invalid hardware key index

Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@...hat.com> writes:

> On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 11:27:38PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> With gcc 4.1.2:
>> 
>>     drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt76x0/tx.c: In function ‘mt76x0_tx’:
>>     drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt76x0/tx.c:169: warning:
>> comparison is always true due to limited range of data type
>>     drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt76x2_tx_common.c: In function ‘mt76x2_tx’:
>>     drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt76x2_tx_common.c:35:
>> warning: comparison is always true due to limited range of data type
>> 
>> While assigning -1 to a u8 works fine, comparing with -1 does not work
>> as expected.
>> 
>> Fix this by comparing with 0xff, like is already done in some other
>> places.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
>
> Ack for mt76x0. I think Lorenzo already posted patch for mt76x2.

Yeah, Lorenzo's patch is here:

https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10570555/

As Geert's patch seems to be more complete I'm planning to take Geert's
version.

-- 
Kalle Valo

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ