netdev - misleading comment in netdevice.h?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180824065838.Horde.3WWAJILxWuZk7k4dF2ShWSr@crashcourse.ca>
Date:   Fri, 24 Aug 2018 06:58:38 -0400
From:   rpjday@...shcourse.ca
To:     netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: misleading comment in netdevice.h?

   just pedantry here ... was perusing include/linux/netdevice.h, and in the
declaration for struct net_device, the kerneldoc, one reads:

  *      @flags:         Interface flags (a la BSD)
  *      @priv_flags:    Like 'flags' but invisible to userspace,
  *                      see if.h for the definitions

assuming "if.h" means include/uapi/linux/if.h, there is nothing in that
file explaining the *private* flags; rather, the private flags appear
to be explained earlier in netdevice.h -- it's the *normal* flags that
seem to be defined in if.h.

   or am i just misreading stuff again?

rday