netdev - Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen-netfront: wait xenbus state change when load module manually

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 24 Aug 2018 13:12:52 +0200
From:   Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
To:     Xiao Liang <xiliang@...hat.com>, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     jgross@...e.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen-netfront: wait xenbus state change when
 load module manually

On 07/30/2018, 10:18 AM, Xiao Liang wrote:
> On 07/29/2018 11:30 PM, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Xiao Liang <xiliang@...hat.com>
>> Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2018 17:56:08 +0800
>>
>>> @@ -1330,6 +1331,11 @@ static struct net_device
>>> *xennet_create_dev(struct xenbus_device *dev)
>>>       netif_carrier_off(netdev);
>>>         xenbus_switch_state(dev, XenbusStateInitialising);
>>> +    wait_event(module_load_q,
>>> +               xenbus_read_driver_state(dev->otherend) !=
>>> +               XenbusStateClosed &&
>>> +               xenbus_read_driver_state(dev->otherend) !=
>>> +               XenbusStateUnknown);
>>>       return netdev;
>>>      exit:
>> What performs the wakeups that will trigger for this sleep site?
> In my understanding, backend leaving closed/unknow state can trigger the
> wakeups. I mean to make sure both sides are ready for creating connection.

While backporting this to 4.12, I was surprised by the commit the same
as Boris and David.

So I assume the explanation is that wake_up_all of module_unload_q in
netback_changed wakes also all the processes waiting on module_load_q?
If so, what makes sure that module_unload_q is queued and the process is
the same as for module_load_q?

To me, it looks rather error-prone. Unless it is erroneous now, at least
for future changes. Wouldn't it make sense to wake up module_load_q
along with module_unload_q in netback_changed? Or drop module_load_q
completely and use only module_unload_q (i.e. in xennet_create_dev too)?

thanks,
-- 
js
suse labs