netdev - Re: [PATCH] net: sched: Fix memory exposure from short TCA_U32

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAGXu5jK7VzayzZTcxgZBf-+YHWO+Hv7s8utj2rzTc3gFtA8pFQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Sat, 25 Aug 2018 23:19:30 -0700
From:   Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To:     Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
        Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
        Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: sched: Fix memory exposure from short TCA_U32_SEL

On Sat, Aug 25, 2018 at 11:15 PM, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 25, 2018 at 10:58:01PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
>> Via u32_change(), TCA_U32_SEL has an unspecified type in the netlink
>> policy, so max length isn't enforced, only minimum. This means nkeys
>> (from userspace) was being trusted without checking the actual size of
>> nla_len(), which could lead to a memory over-read, and ultimately an
>> exposure via a call to u32_dump(). Reachability is CAP_NET_ADMIN within
>> a namespace.
>>
>> Reported-by: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
>> Cc: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
>> Cc: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
>> Cc: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
>> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
>> Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
>> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
>> ---
>> This should go through -stable please, but I have left off the "Cc:
>> stable" as per netdev patch policy. Note that use of struct_size()
>> will need manual expansion in backports, such as:
>>       sel_size = sizeof(*s) + sizeof(*s->keys) * s->nkeys;
>
> Saner approach would be sel_size = offsetof(struct tc_u32_sel, keys[s->nkeys])...

Either is fine by me.

>> +     sel_size = struct_size(s, keys, s->nkeys);
>> +     if (nla_len(tb[TCA_U32_SEL]) < sel_size) {
>> +             err = -EINVAL;
>> +             goto erridr;
>> +     }
>>
>> -     n = kzalloc(sizeof(*n) + s->nkeys*sizeof(struct tc_u32_key), GFP_KERNEL);
>> +     n = kzalloc(offsetof(typeof(*n), sel) + sel_size, GFP_KERNEL);
>
> ITYM
>         n = kzalloc(offsetof(struct tc_u_common, sel.keys[s->nkeys]), GFP_KERNEL);

I prefer to reuse sel_size and keep typeof() to keep things tied to
"n" more directly. *shrug*

-Kees

-- 
Kees Cook
Pixel Security