netdev - Re: [PATCH v2 01/17] asm: simd context helper API

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 26 Aug 2018 14:10:35 +0200 (CEST)
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:     "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>
cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Samuel Neves <sneves@....uc.pt>, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
        Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/17] asm: simd context helper API

On Fri, 24 Aug 2018, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:

> Sometimes it's useful to amortize calls to XSAVE/XRSTOR and the related
> FPU/SIMD functions over a number of calls, because FPU restoration is
> quite expensive. This adds a simple header for carrying out this pattern:
> 
>     simd_context_t simd_context = simd_get();
>     while ((item = get_item_from_queue()) != NULL) {
>         encrypt_item(item, simd_context);
>         simd_context = simd_relax(simd_context);
>     }
>     simd_put(simd_context);

I'm not too fond of this simply because it requires that relax() step in
all code pathes. I'd rather make that completely transparent by just
marking the task as FPU using and let the context switch code deal with it
in case that it gets preempted. I'll let one of my engineers look into
that next week.

Thanks,

	tglx