[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.21.1808270403420.22848@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2018 04:04:48 -0400 (EDT)
From: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@...shcourse.ca>
To: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@...tkopp.net>
cc: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Linux kernel netdev mailing list <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: confusing comment, explanation of @IFF_RUNNING in if.h
On Mon, 27 Aug 2018, Oliver Hartkopp wrote:
> "released upon production" means usually: Oh, we put that driver in
> a tar-ball on a CD that's shipped with the product and which will
> get no further visibility nor (security) maintenance.
>
> Robert, please tell your manager that creating a driver is no rocket
> science and also brings no "costumer differentiation" which needs to
> be covered under NDA.
>
> Posting drivers and bring it into mainline Linux heavily increases
> the quality due to the review process and all the people that are
> willing to help you to get better. At the end your driver gets
> long-term maintenance and other people can benefit from it - as your
> boss is getting benefit from using Linux right now.
>
> When something is "released upon production" it will not be in a
> quality that it could go into the kernel - and no one will have the
> time/money/ambition to spend effort on it then. You have just
> produced one of the numerous dead out-of-tree drivers. That would be
> just sad.
i make these arguments on a regular basis with all of my clients
but, as a contractor, i have little influence. but i will continue to
make them.
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
http://crashcourse.ca/dokuwiki
Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday
LinkedIn: http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
========================================================================
Powered by blists - more mailing lists