[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.21.1808270448030.28019@localhost.localdomain>
Date:   Mon, 27 Aug 2018 04:55:29 -0400 (EDT)
From:   "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@...shcourse.ca>
To:     Linux kernel netdev mailing list <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: any reason for "!!netif_carrier_ok" and "!!netif_dormant" in
 net-sysfs.c?
  another pedantic oddity -- is there a reason for these two double
negations in net/core/net-sysfs.c?
static ssize_t carrier_show(struct device *dev,
                            struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
{
        struct net_device *netdev = to_net_dev(dev);
        if (netif_running(netdev))
                return sprintf(buf, fmt_dec, !!netif_carrier_ok(netdev));
...
static ssize_t dormant_show(struct device *dev,
                            struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
{
        struct net_device *netdev = to_net_dev(dev);
        if (netif_running(netdev))
                return sprintf(buf, fmt_dec, !!netif_dormant(netdev));
  i understand the normal rationale for !! in assuring a final boolean
value of precisely either 0 or 1 (here for the sake of printing), but
given that those two routines are declared with a return value of
"bool" in netdevice.h, i don't see any way that they can return
anything *other* than 0 or 1. i realize it can't possibly hurt, but
whenever i see this construct, i normally assume there's a *reason*
for it, but i can't see what it's doing in those two places.
rday
-- 
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day                                 Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
                  http://crashcourse.ca/dokuwiki
Twitter:                                       http://twitter.com/rpjday
LinkedIn:                               http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
========================================================================
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
 
