[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.21.1808270448030.28019@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2018 04:55:29 -0400 (EDT)
From: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@...shcourse.ca>
To: Linux kernel netdev mailing list <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: any reason for "!!netif_carrier_ok" and "!!netif_dormant" in
net-sysfs.c?
another pedantic oddity -- is there a reason for these two double
negations in net/core/net-sysfs.c?
static ssize_t carrier_show(struct device *dev,
struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
{
struct net_device *netdev = to_net_dev(dev);
if (netif_running(netdev))
return sprintf(buf, fmt_dec, !!netif_carrier_ok(netdev));
...
static ssize_t dormant_show(struct device *dev,
struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
{
struct net_device *netdev = to_net_dev(dev);
if (netif_running(netdev))
return sprintf(buf, fmt_dec, !!netif_dormant(netdev));
i understand the normal rationale for !! in assuring a final boolean
value of precisely either 0 or 1 (here for the sake of printing), but
given that those two routines are declared with a return value of
"bool" in netdevice.h, i don't see any way that they can return
anything *other* than 0 or 1. i realize it can't possibly hurt, but
whenever i see this construct, i normally assume there's a *reason*
for it, but i can't see what it's doing in those two places.
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
http://crashcourse.ca/dokuwiki
Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday
LinkedIn: http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
========================================================================
Powered by blists - more mailing lists