netdev - Re: [PATCH net] sctp: hold transport before accessing its asoc in sctp_transport_get

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180827130803.GA12418@hmswarspite.think-freely.org>
Date:   Mon, 27 Aug 2018 09:08:03 -0400
From:   Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
To:     Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>
Cc:     network dev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org,
        davem@...emloft.net,
        Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] sctp: hold transport before accessing its asoc in
 sctp_transport_get_next

On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 06:38:31PM +0800, Xin Long wrote:
> As Marcelo noticed, in sctp_transport_get_next, it is iterating over
> transports but then also accessing the association directly, without
> checking any refcnts before that, which can cause an use-after-free
> Read.
> 
> So fix it by holding transport before accessing the association. With
> that, sctp_transport_hold calls can be removed in the later places.
> 
> Fixes: 626d16f50f39 ("sctp: export some apis or variables for sctp_diag and reuse some for proc")
> Reported-by: syzbot+fe62a0c9aa6a85c6de16@...kaller.appspotmail.com
> Signed-off-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>
> ---
>  net/sctp/proc.c   |  4 ----
>  net/sctp/socket.c | 22 +++++++++++++++-------
>  2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/sctp/proc.c b/net/sctp/proc.c
> index ef5c9a8..4d6f1c8 100644
> --- a/net/sctp/proc.c
> +++ b/net/sctp/proc.c
> @@ -264,8 +264,6 @@ static int sctp_assocs_seq_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
>  	}
>  
>  	transport = (struct sctp_transport *)v;
> -	if (!sctp_transport_hold(transport))
> -		return 0;
>  	assoc = transport->asoc;
>  	epb = &assoc->base;
>  	sk = epb->sk;
> @@ -322,8 +320,6 @@ static int sctp_remaddr_seq_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
>  	}
>  
>  	transport = (struct sctp_transport *)v;
> -	if (!sctp_transport_hold(transport))
> -		return 0;
>  	assoc = transport->asoc;
>  
>  	list_for_each_entry_rcu(tsp, &assoc->peer.transport_addr_list,
> diff --git a/net/sctp/socket.c b/net/sctp/socket.c
> index e96b15a..aa76586 100644
> --- a/net/sctp/socket.c
> +++ b/net/sctp/socket.c
> @@ -5005,9 +5005,14 @@ struct sctp_transport *sctp_transport_get_next(struct net *net,
>  			break;
>  		}
>  
> +		if (!sctp_transport_hold(t))
> +			continue;
> +
>  		if (net_eq(sock_net(t->asoc->base.sk), net) &&
>  		    t->asoc->peer.primary_path == t)
>  			break;
> +
> +		sctp_transport_put(t);
>  	}
>  
>  	return t;
> @@ -5017,13 +5022,18 @@ struct sctp_transport *sctp_transport_get_idx(struct net *net,
>  					      struct rhashtable_iter *iter,
>  					      int pos)
>  {
> -	void *obj = SEQ_START_TOKEN;
> +	struct sctp_transport *t;
>  
> -	while (pos && (obj = sctp_transport_get_next(net, iter)) &&
> -	       !IS_ERR(obj))
> -		pos--;
> +	if (!pos)
> +		return SEQ_START_TOKEN;
>  
> -	return obj;
> +	while ((t = sctp_transport_get_next(net, iter)) && !IS_ERR(t)) {
> +		if (!--pos)
> +			break;
> +		sctp_transport_put(t);
> +	}
> +
> +	return t;
>  }
>  
>  int sctp_for_each_endpoint(int (*cb)(struct sctp_endpoint *, void *),
> @@ -5082,8 +5092,6 @@ int sctp_for_each_transport(int (*cb)(struct sctp_transport *, void *),
>  
>  	tsp = sctp_transport_get_idx(net, &hti, *pos + 1);
>  	for (; !IS_ERR_OR_NULL(tsp); tsp = sctp_transport_get_next(net, &hti)) {
> -		if (!sctp_transport_hold(tsp))
> -			continue;
>  		ret = cb(tsp, p);
>  		if (ret)
>  			break;
> -- 
> 2.1.0
> 
> 
Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>

Additionally, its not germaine to this particular fix, but why are we still
using that pos variable in sctp_transport_get_idx?  With the conversion to
rhashtables, it doesn't seem particularly useful anymore.

Neil