[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180827133003.GC4591@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2018 10:30:03 -0300
From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>
To: Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>
Cc: network dev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org,
davem@...emloft.net, Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] sctp: remove useless start_fail from sctp_ht_iter in
proc
On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 06:40:18PM +0800, Xin Long wrote:
> After changing rhashtable_walk_start to return void, start_fail would
> never be set other value than 0, and the checking for start_fail is
> pointless, so remove it.
>
> Fixes: 97a6ec4ac021 ("rhashtable: Change rhashtable_walk_start to return void")
> Signed-off-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>
Acked-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>
> ---
> net/sctp/proc.c | 4 ----
> 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/sctp/proc.c b/net/sctp/proc.c
> index 4d6f1c8..a644292 100644
> --- a/net/sctp/proc.c
> +++ b/net/sctp/proc.c
> @@ -215,7 +215,6 @@ static const struct seq_operations sctp_eps_ops = {
> struct sctp_ht_iter {
> struct seq_net_private p;
> struct rhashtable_iter hti;
> - int start_fail;
> };
>
> static void *sctp_transport_seq_start(struct seq_file *seq, loff_t *pos)
> @@ -224,7 +223,6 @@ static void *sctp_transport_seq_start(struct seq_file *seq, loff_t *pos)
>
> sctp_transport_walk_start(&iter->hti);
>
> - iter->start_fail = 0;
> return sctp_transport_get_idx(seq_file_net(seq), &iter->hti, *pos);
> }
>
> @@ -232,8 +230,6 @@ static void sctp_transport_seq_stop(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
> {
> struct sctp_ht_iter *iter = seq->private;
>
> - if (iter->start_fail)
> - return;
> sctp_transport_walk_stop(&iter->hti);
> }
>
> --
> 2.1.0
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists