[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <TY1PR01MB1562269EC6BE932742A119938A0B0@TY1PR01MB1562.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2018 17:30:17 +0000
From: Chris Brandt <Chris.Brandt@...esas.com>
To: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
CC: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
Simon Horman <horms+renesas@...ge.net.au>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] sh_eth: Add R7S9210 support
Hi Sergei,
On Friday, August 24, 2018 1, linux-renesas-soc-owner@...r.kernel.org wrote:
> On 08/22/2018 11:57 PM, Chris Brandt wrote:
> > +static const u16 sh_eth_offset_fast_rza2[SH_ETH_MAX_REGISTER_OFFSET] =
> {
> > + SH_ETH_OFFSET_DEFAULTS,
> > +
(snip)
> > + [RFCR] = 0x01f4,
> > + [MAFCR] = 0x01f8,
> > +};
> > +
>
> This array is absolutely the same as sh_eth_offset_fast_sh4[], except
> the latter
> is (more or less) sorted.
You're right. I'll just use sh_eth_offset_fast_sh4[].
> > +
> > + switch (mdp->speed) {
> > + case 10: /* 10BASE */
> > + sh_eth_modify(ndev, ECMR, RTM, 0);
> > + break;
> > + case 100:/* 100BASE */
> > + sh_eth_modify(ndev, ECMR, RTM, RTM);
> > + break;
> > + }
> > +}
> > +
>
> Seems the same as sh_eth_set_rate_rcar(), except for the bit name...
You're right.
I looked at the other sh_eth_set_rate_xxx() but didn't seem to find one
that matched.
But, sh_eth_set_rate_rcar() does match. I'll use that one.
Thanks,
Chris
Powered by blists - more mailing lists