lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20180830011849.GA16896@lunn.ch> Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2018 03:18:49 +0200 From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch> To: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com> Cc: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Ivan Khoronzhuk <ivan.khoronzhuk@...aro.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, Murali Karicheri <m-karicheri2@...com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: net: cpsw: Document cpsw-phy-sel usage but prefer phandle > In the long run cpsw should be really treated as an > interconnect instance with it's control module providing > standard Linux framework services such as clock / > regulator / phy / pinctrl / iio whatever for the other > modules. Some of us have been applying pressure for a new driver. This sounds like another argument for such a re-write. Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists