| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20180830011849.GA16896@lunn.ch>
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2018 03:18:49 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
Cc: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Ivan Khoronzhuk <ivan.khoronzhuk@...aro.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Murali Karicheri <m-karicheri2@...com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: net: cpsw: Document cpsw-phy-sel usage
but prefer phandle
> In the long run cpsw should be really treated as an
> interconnect instance with it's control module providing
> standard Linux framework services such as clock /
> regulator / phy / pinctrl / iio whatever for the other
> modules.
Some of us have been applying pressure for a new driver. This sounds
like another argument for such a re-write.
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists