[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180830011849.GA16896@lunn.ch>
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2018 03:18:49 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
Cc: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Ivan Khoronzhuk <ivan.khoronzhuk@...aro.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Murali Karicheri <m-karicheri2@...com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: net: cpsw: Document cpsw-phy-sel usage
but prefer phandle
> In the long run cpsw should be really treated as an
> interconnect instance with it's control module providing
> standard Linux framework services such as clock /
> regulator / phy / pinctrl / iio whatever for the other
> modules.
Some of us have been applying pressure for a new driver. This sounds
like another argument for such a re-write.
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists