[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180831160913.325ee36b@xhacker.debian>
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2018 16:09:13 +0800
From: Jisheng Zhang <Jisheng.Zhang@...aptics.com>
To: <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net-next v2 1/3] net: mvneta: Don't check NETIF_F_GRO
ourself
napi_gro_receive() checks NETIF_F_GRO bit as well, if the bit is not
set, we will go through GRO_NORMAL in napi_skb_finish(), so fall back
to netif_receive_skb_internal(), so we don't need to check NETIF_F_GRO
ourself.
Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <Jisheng.Zhang@...aptics.com>
Reviewed-by: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c | 5 +----
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c
index bc80a678abc3..814aee92a1d3 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c
@@ -2065,10 +2065,7 @@ static int mvneta_rx_swbm(struct napi_struct *napi,
/* Linux processing */
rxq->skb->protocol = eth_type_trans(rxq->skb, dev);
- if (dev->features & NETIF_F_GRO)
- napi_gro_receive(napi, rxq->skb);
- else
- netif_receive_skb(rxq->skb);
+ napi_gro_receive(napi, rxq->skb);
/* clean uncomplete skb pointer in queue */
rxq->skb = NULL;
--
2.18.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists