[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180901095146.15627-1-baijiaju1990@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2018 17:51:46 +0800
From: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@...il.com>
To: sameo@...ux.intel.com, davem@...emloft.net, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk
Cc: linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH] net: nfc: nci: Fix a sleep-in-atomic-context bug in nci_uart_default_recv_buf()
The kernel module may sleep with holding a spinlock.
The function call paths (from bottom to top) in Linux-4.16 are:
[FUNC] nci_skb_alloc(GFP_KERNEL)
net/nfc/nci/uart.c, 349:
nci_skb_alloc in nci_uart_default_recv_buf
net/nfc/nci/uart.c, 255:
[FUNC_PTR]nci_uart_default_recv_buf in nci_uart_tty_receive
net/nfc/nci/uart.c, 254:
spin_lock in nci_uart_tty_receive
Note that [FUNC_PTR] means a function pointer call is used.
To fix this bug, GFP_KERNEL is replaced with GFP_ATOMIC.
This bug is found by my static analysis tool DSAC.
Signed-off-by: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@...il.com>
---
net/nfc/nci/uart.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/nfc/nci/uart.c b/net/nfc/nci/uart.c
index a66f102c6c01..040576dd73bb 100644
--- a/net/nfc/nci/uart.c
+++ b/net/nfc/nci/uart.c
@@ -348,7 +348,7 @@ static int nci_uart_default_recv_buf(struct nci_uart *nu, const u8 *data,
nu->rx_packet_len = -1;
nu->rx_skb = nci_skb_alloc(nu->ndev,
NCI_MAX_PACKET_SIZE,
- GFP_KERNEL);
+ GFP_ATOMIC);
if (!nu->rx_skb)
return -ENOMEM;
}
--
2.17.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists