[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180903043717.20136-3-christian@brauner.io>
Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2018 06:37:14 +0200
From: Christian Brauner <christian@...uner.io>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, kuznet@....inr.ac.ru, yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org,
pombredanne@...b.com, kstewart@...uxfoundation.org,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, dsahern@...il.com, fw@...len.de,
ktkhai@...tuozzo.com, lucien.xin@...il.com,
jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com, jbenc@...hat.com,
nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com, Christian Brauner <christian@...uner.io>
Subject: [PATCH net-next v1 2/5] if_addr: add IFA_IF_NETNSID
This adds a new IFA_IF_NETNSID property to be used by address families such
as PF_INET and PF_INET6.
The IFA_IF_NETNSID property can be used to send a network namespace
identifier as part of a request. If a IFA_IF_NETNSID property is identified
it will be used to retrieve the target network namespace in which the
request is to be made.
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <christian@...uner.io>
Cc: Jiri Benc <jbenc@...hat.com>
Cc: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>
---
v0->v1:
- unchanged
Note, I did not change the property name to IFA_TARGET_NSID as there
was no clear agreement what would be preferred. My personal preference
is to keep the IFA_IF_NETNSID name because it aligns naturally with
the IFLA_IF_NETNSID property for RTM_*LINK requests. Jiri seems to
prefer this name too.
However, if there is agreement that another property name makes more
sense I'm happy to send a v2 that changes this.
---
include/uapi/linux/if_addr.h | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/if_addr.h b/include/uapi/linux/if_addr.h
index ebaf5701c9db..0e0cd588cac0 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/if_addr.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/if_addr.h
@@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ enum {
IFA_MULTICAST,
IFA_FLAGS,
IFA_RT_PRIORITY, /* u32, priority/metric for prefix route */
+ IFA_IF_NETNSID,
__IFA_MAX,
};
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists