netdev - Re: [RFT net-next] net: stmmac: Rework coalesce timer and fix multi-queue races

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <678dfc4b-9945-186b-33b5-dd2c32984e6f@synopsys.com>
Date:   Mon, 3 Sep 2018 12:47:45 +0100
From:   Jose Abreu <Jose.Abreu@...opsys.com>
To:     Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>,
        Jose Abreu <Jose.Abreu@...opsys.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Joao Pinto <Joao.Pinto@...opsys.com>,
        Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@...com>,
        Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>
Subject: Re: [RFT net-next] net: stmmac: Rework coalesce timer and fix
 multi-queue races

On 03-09-2018 11:16, Jerome Brunet wrote:
> No notable change. Rx is fine but Tx:
> [  5]   3.00-4.00   sec  3.55 MBytes  29.8 Mbits/sec   51   12.7 KBytes
>
> I suppose the problem as something to do with the retries. When doing Tx test
> alone, we don't have such a things a throughput where we expect it to be.

Yeah, I just remembered you are not using GMAC4 so it wouldn't
make a difference. Is your version 3.710? If so please try adding
the following compatible to your DT bindings "snps,dwmac-3.710".

>
> By the way, your mailer (and its auto 80 column rule I suppose) made the patch
> below a bit harder to apply

Sorry. Next time I will send as attachment.

Thanks and Best Regards,
Jose Miguel Abreu