netdev - Re: [PATCH] [RFC v2] Drop all 00-INDEX files from Documentation/

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 5 Sep 2018 07:42:04 -0400
From:   Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
To:     henrik@...tad.us
Cc:     linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, corbet@....net, bhelgaas@...gle.com,
        paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, josh@...htriplett.org,
        rostedt@...dmis.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
        jiangshanlai@...il.com, axboe@...nel.dk, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        mark.rutland@....com, b.zolnierkie@...sung.com,
        linus.walleij@...aro.org, davem@...emloft.net, isdn@...ux-pingi.de,
        yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com, michal.lkml@...kovi.net,
        peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com, will.deacon@....com,
        ralf@...ux-mips.org, paul.burton@...s.com, jhogan@...nel.org,
        jejb@...isc-linux.org, deller@....de, rjw@...ysocki.net,
        len.brown@...el.com, pavel@....cz, benh@...nel.crashing.org,
        paulus@...ba.org, mpe@...erman.id.au, schwidefsky@...ibm.com,
        heiko.carstens@...ibm.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
        jslaby@...e.com, broonie@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
        pbonzini@...hat.com, rkrcmar@...hat.com, zbr@...emap.net,
        hpa@...or.com, x86@...nel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        raven@...maw.net, jacek.anaszewski@...il.com,
        rppt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, jjj@....de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mips@...ux-mips.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org, haustad@...co.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RFC v2] Drop all 00-INDEX files from Documentation/

On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 6:15 PM Henrik Austad <henrik@...tad.us> wrote:
> This is a respin with a wider audience (all that get_maintainer returned)
> and I know this spams a *lot* of people. Not sure what would be the correct
> way, so my apologies for ruining your inbox.
>
> The 00-INDEX files are supposed to give a summary of all files present
> in a directory, but these files are horribly out of date and their
> usefulness is brought into question. Often a simple "ls" would reveal
> the same information as the filenames are generally quite descriptive as
> a short introduction to what the file covers (it should not surprise
> anyone what Documentation/sched/sched-design-CFS.txt covers)
>
> A few years back it was mentioned that these files were no longer really
> needed, and they have since then grown further out of date, so perhaps
> it is time to just throw them out.
>
> A short status yields the following _outdated_ 00-INDEX files, first
> counter is files listed in 00-INDEX but missing in the directory, last
> is files present but not listed in 00-INDEX.
>
> List of outdated 00-INDEX:
> Documentation: (4/10)
> Documentation/sysctl: (0/1)
> Documentation/timers: (1/0)
> Documentation/blockdev: (3/1)
> Documentation/w1/slaves: (0/1)
> Documentation/locking: (0/1)
> Documentation/devicetree: (0/5)
> Documentation/power: (1/1)
> Documentation/powerpc: (0/5)
> Documentation/arm: (1/0)
> Documentation/x86: (0/9)
> Documentation/x86/x86_64: (1/1)
> Documentation/scsi: (4/4)
> Documentation/filesystems: (2/9)
> Documentation/filesystems/nfs: (0/2)
> Documentation/cgroup-v1: (0/2)
> Documentation/kbuild: (0/4)
> Documentation/spi: (1/0)
> Documentation/virtual/kvm: (1/0)
> Documentation/scheduler: (0/2)
> Documentation/fb: (0/1)
> Documentation/block: (0/1)
> Documentation/networking: (6/37)
> Documentation/vm: (1/3)
>
> Then there are 364 subdirectories in Documentation/ with several files that
> are missing 00-INDEX alltogether (and another 120 with a single file and no
> 00-INDEX).
>
> I don't really have an opinion to whether or not we /should/ have 00-INDEX,
> but the above 00-INDEX should either be removed or be kept up to date. If
> we should keep the files, I can try to keep them updated, but I rather not
> if we just want to delete them anyway.
>
> As a starting point, remove all index-files and references to 00-INDEX and
> see where the discussion is going.
>
> Again, sorry for the insanely wide distribution.
>
> Signed-off-by: Henrik Austad <henrik@...tad.us>
...
> Signed-off-by: Henrik Austad <haustad@...co.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/00-INDEX                  | 428 --------------------------------
...

Looks reasonable to me, you can add my ACK for the NetLabel bits.

Acked-by: Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>

-- 
paul moore
www.paul-moore.com