[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180905154104.20e7f92c@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2018 15:41:04 +0200
From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
Cc: Nick Viljoen <nick.viljoen@...ronome.com>,
oss-drivers@...ronome.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
"John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>, jhsiao@...hat.com,
Quentin Monnet <quentin.monnet@...ronome.com>,
brouer@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [oss-drivers] Re: [RFC bpf-next PATCH] samples/bpf: xdp1 add
XDP hardware offload option
On Tue, 4 Sep 2018 18:59:57 +0200
Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Sep 2018 18:49:33 +0200, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> > On Tue, 4 Sep 2018 17:09:12 +0200
> > Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com> wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, 04 Sep 2018 16:59:19 +0200, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> > > > Trying to use XDP hardware offloading via XDP_FLAGS_HW_MODE
> > > > and setting the ifindex in prog_load_attr.ifindex before
> > > > loading the BPF code via bpf_prog_load_xattr().
> > > >
> > > > This unfortunately does not seem to work...
> > > > - Am I doing something wrong?
> > > >
> > > > Notice, I also disable the map BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_ARRAY
> > > > to make sure it was not related to the map (not supporting
> > > > offloading).
> > > >
> > > > Failed with:
> > > > # ./xdp1 -O $(</sys/class/net/enp130s0np1/ifindex)
> > > > libbpf: load bpf program failed: Invalid argument
> > > > libbpf: failed to load program 'xdp1'
> > > > libbpf: failed to load object './xdp1_kern.o'
> > > >
> > > > Tested on kernel 4.18.0-2.el8.x86_64 with driver nfp
> > > > Ethernet controller: Netronome Systems, Inc. Device 4000
> > >
> > > Are you running the BPF capable FW?
> > >
> > > https://help.netronome.com/support/solutions/articles/36000050009-agilio-ebpf-2-0-6-extended-berkeley-packet-filter
> >
> > I'm likely not running the correct firmware...
> >
> > Can you tell me, with the ethtool -i output, if I'm running the
> > appropriate firmware?
> >
> > # ethtool -i enp129s0np1
> > driver: nfp
> > version: 4.18.0-2.el8.x86_64 SMP mod_unl
> > firmware-version: 0.0.3.5 0.21 nic-2.0.7 nic
> > expansion-rom-version:
> > bus-info: 0000:81:00.0
> > supports-statistics: yes
> > supports-test: no
> > supports-eeprom-access: no
> > supports-register-dump: yes
> > supports-priv-flags: no
>
> Yup, the BPF firmware says bpf in firmware version.
Downloaded: agilio-bpf-firmware-2.0.6.121-1.noarch.rpm
RPM install it:
rpm -hiv agilio-bpf-firmware-2.0.6.121-1.noarch.rpm
# rpm -ql agilio-bpf-firmware
/opt/netronome/firmware/agilio-bpf
/opt/netronome/firmware/agilio-bpf/nic_AMDA0058-0011_2x40.nffw
/opt/netronome/firmware/agilio-bpf/nic_AMDA0058-0012_2x40.nffw
/opt/netronome/firmware/agilio-bpf/nic_AMDA0078-0011_1x100.nffw
/opt/netronome/firmware/agilio-bpf/nic_AMDA0081-0001_1x40.nffw
/opt/netronome/firmware/agilio-bpf/nic_AMDA0081-0001_4x10.nffw
/opt/netronome/firmware/agilio-bpf/nic_AMDA0096-0001_2x10.nffw
/opt/netronome/firmware/agilio-bpf/nic_AMDA0097-0001_2x40.nffw
/opt/netronome/firmware/agilio-bpf/nic_AMDA0097-0001_4x10_1x40.nffw
/opt/netronome/firmware/agilio-bpf/nic_AMDA0097-0001_8x10.nffw
/opt/netronome/firmware/agilio-bpf/nic_AMDA0099-0001_1x10_1x25.nffw
/opt/netronome/firmware/agilio-bpf/nic_AMDA0099-0001_2x10.nffw
/opt/netronome/firmware/agilio-bpf/nic_AMDA0099-0001_2x25.nffw
Netronome: Basic Firmware User Guide
https://help.netronome.com/support/solutions/articles/36000049975-basic-firmware-user-guide
A section says after installing the firmware, unload and reload the
driver kernel module will upgrade the firmware.
## reload driver to load new firmware
rmmod nfp; modprobe nfp
Firmware upgrade worked! :-) This is by-far the easiest firmware
upgrade I've experienced. And I don't have to reboot the machine :-)
# ethtool -i enp130s0np1 | grep firmware-version
firmware-version: 0.0.3.5 0.21 bpf-2.0.6.121 ebpf
Notice the bpf/ebpf strings in firmware-version.
> > If this is a firmware version case, then we should really improve the
> > errors we are giving the user, the -EINVAL can be anything.
> >
> > "libbpf: load bpf program failed: Invalid argument"
>
> That is true.
Same goes for improving the error message, when loading a map type that
offload cannot handle.
--
Best regards,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer
MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer
Powered by blists - more mailing lists