netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 10/11] tap: accept an array of XDP buffs through sendmsg()

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180906135450-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
Date:   Thu, 6 Sep 2018 14:00:56 -0400
From:   "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To:     Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kvm@...r.kernel.org, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 10/11] tap: accept an array of XDP buffs through
 sendmsg()

On Thu, Sep 06, 2018 at 12:05:25PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> This patch implement TUN_MSG_PTR msg_control type. This type allows
> the caller to pass an array of XDP buffs to tuntap through ptr field
> of the tun_msg_control. Tap will build skb through those XDP buffers.
> 
> This will avoid lots of indirect calls thus improves the icache
> utilization and allows to do XDP batched flushing when doing XDP
> redirection.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/tap.c | 73 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 71 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/tap.c b/drivers/net/tap.c
> index 7996ed7cbf18..50eb7bf22225 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/tap.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/tap.c
> @@ -1146,14 +1146,83 @@ static const struct file_operations tap_fops = {
>  #endif
>  };
>  
> +static int tap_get_user_xdp(struct tap_queue *q, struct xdp_buff *xdp)
> +{
> +	struct virtio_net_hdr *gso = xdp->data_hard_start + sizeof(int);
> +	int buflen = *(int *)xdp->data_hard_start;
> +	int vnet_hdr_len = 0;
> +	struct tap_dev *tap;
> +	struct sk_buff *skb;
> +	int err, depth;
> +
> +	if (q->flags & IFF_VNET_HDR)
> +		vnet_hdr_len = READ_ONCE(q->vnet_hdr_sz);
> +
> +	skb = build_skb(xdp->data_hard_start, buflen);
> +	if (!skb) {
> +		err = -ENOMEM;
> +		goto err;
> +	}

So fundamentally why is it called XDP?
We just build and skb, don't we?

> +
> +	skb_reserve(skb, xdp->data - xdp->data_hard_start);
> +	skb_put(skb, xdp->data_end - xdp->data);
> +
> +	skb_set_network_header(skb, ETH_HLEN);
> +	skb_reset_mac_header(skb);
> +	skb->protocol = eth_hdr(skb)->h_proto;
> +
> +	if (vnet_hdr_len) {
> +		err = virtio_net_hdr_to_skb(skb, gso, tap_is_little_endian(q));
> +		if (err)
> +			goto err_kfree;
> +	}
> +
> +	skb_probe_transport_header(skb, ETH_HLEN);
> +
> +	/* Move network header to the right position for VLAN tagged packets */
> +	if ((skb->protocol == htons(ETH_P_8021Q) ||
> +	     skb->protocol == htons(ETH_P_8021AD)) &&
> +	    __vlan_get_protocol(skb, skb->protocol, &depth) != 0)
> +		skb_set_network_header(skb, depth);
> +
> +	rcu_read_lock();
> +	tap = rcu_dereference(q->tap);
> +	if (tap) {
> +		skb->dev = tap->dev;
> +		dev_queue_xmit(skb);
> +	} else {
> +		kfree_skb(skb);
> +	}
> +	rcu_read_unlock();
> +
> +	return 0;
> +
> +err_kfree:
> +	kfree_skb(skb);
> +err:
> +	rcu_read_lock();
> +		tap = rcu_dereference(q->tap);
> +	if (tap && tap->count_tx_dropped)
> +		tap->count_tx_dropped(tap);
> +	rcu_read_unlock();
> +	return err;
> +}
> +
>  static int tap_sendmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *m,
>  		       size_t total_len)
>  {
>  	struct tap_queue *q = container_of(sock, struct tap_queue, sock);
>  	struct tun_msg_ctl *ctl = m->msg_control;
> +	struct xdp_buff *xdp;
> +	int i;
>  
> -	if (ctl && ctl->type != TUN_MSG_UBUF)
> -		return -EINVAL;
> +	if (ctl && ((ctl->type & 0xF) == TUN_MSG_PTR)) {
> +		for (i = 0; i < ctl->type >> 16; i++) {
> +			xdp = &((struct xdp_buff *)ctl->ptr)[i];
> +			tap_get_user_xdp(q, xdp);
> +		}
> +		return 0;
> +	}
>  
>  	return tap_get_user(q, ctl ? ctl->ptr : NULL, &m->msg_iter,
>  			    m->msg_flags & MSG_DONTWAIT);
> -- 
> 2.17.1