| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20180906040952.29684-11-saeedm@mellanox.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2018 21:09:52 -0700
From: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Roi Dayan <roid@...lanox.com>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>
Subject: [net 10/10] net/mlx5: Fix possible deadlock from lockdep when adding fte to fg
From: Roi Dayan <roid@...lanox.com>
This is a false positive report due to incorrect nested lock
annotations as we lock multiple fgs with the same subclass.
Instead of locking all fgs only lock the one being used as was
done before.
Fixes: bd71b08ec2ee ("net/mlx5: Support multiple updates of steering rules in parallel")
Signed-off-by: Roi Dayan <roid@...lanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>
---
.../net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/fs_core.c | 74 +++++++++----------
1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/fs_core.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/fs_core.c
index 384b560f2a93..37d114c668b7 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/fs_core.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/fs_core.c
@@ -1578,6 +1578,33 @@ static u64 matched_fgs_get_version(struct list_head *match_head)
return version;
}
+static struct fs_fte *
+lookup_fte_locked(struct mlx5_flow_group *g,
+ u32 *match_value,
+ bool take_write)
+{
+ struct fs_fte *fte_tmp;
+
+ if (take_write)
+ nested_down_write_ref_node(&g->node, FS_LOCK_PARENT);
+ else
+ nested_down_read_ref_node(&g->node, FS_LOCK_PARENT);
+ fte_tmp = rhashtable_lookup_fast(&g->ftes_hash, match_value,
+ rhash_fte);
+ if (!fte_tmp || !tree_get_node(&fte_tmp->node)) {
+ fte_tmp = NULL;
+ goto out;
+ }
+
+ nested_down_write_ref_node(&fte_tmp->node, FS_LOCK_CHILD);
+out:
+ if (take_write)
+ up_write_ref_node(&g->node);
+ else
+ up_read_ref_node(&g->node);
+ return fte_tmp;
+}
+
static struct mlx5_flow_handle *
try_add_to_existing_fg(struct mlx5_flow_table *ft,
struct list_head *match_head,
@@ -1600,10 +1627,6 @@ try_add_to_existing_fg(struct mlx5_flow_table *ft,
if (IS_ERR(fte))
return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
- list_for_each_entry(iter, match_head, list) {
- nested_down_read_ref_node(&iter->g->node, FS_LOCK_PARENT);
- }
-
search_again_locked:
version = matched_fgs_get_version(match_head);
/* Try to find a fg that already contains a matching fte */
@@ -1611,20 +1634,9 @@ try_add_to_existing_fg(struct mlx5_flow_table *ft,
struct fs_fte *fte_tmp;
g = iter->g;
- fte_tmp = rhashtable_lookup_fast(&g->ftes_hash, spec->match_value,
- rhash_fte);
- if (!fte_tmp || !tree_get_node(&fte_tmp->node))
+ fte_tmp = lookup_fte_locked(g, spec->match_value, take_write);
+ if (!fte_tmp)
continue;
-
- nested_down_write_ref_node(&fte_tmp->node, FS_LOCK_CHILD);
- if (!take_write) {
- list_for_each_entry(iter, match_head, list)
- up_read_ref_node(&iter->g->node);
- } else {
- list_for_each_entry(iter, match_head, list)
- up_write_ref_node(&iter->g->node);
- }
-
rule = add_rule_fg(g, spec->match_value,
flow_act, dest, dest_num, fte_tmp);
up_write_ref_node(&fte_tmp->node);
@@ -1633,19 +1645,6 @@ try_add_to_existing_fg(struct mlx5_flow_table *ft,
return rule;
}
- /* No group with matching fte found. Try to add a new fte to any
- * matching fg.
- */
-
- if (!take_write) {
- list_for_each_entry(iter, match_head, list)
- up_read_ref_node(&iter->g->node);
- list_for_each_entry(iter, match_head, list)
- nested_down_write_ref_node(&iter->g->node,
- FS_LOCK_PARENT);
- take_write = true;
- }
-
/* Check the ft version, for case that new flow group
* was added while the fgs weren't locked
*/
@@ -1657,27 +1656,30 @@ try_add_to_existing_fg(struct mlx5_flow_table *ft,
/* Check the fgs version, for case the new FTE with the
* same values was added while the fgs weren't locked
*/
- if (version != matched_fgs_get_version(match_head))
+ if (version != matched_fgs_get_version(match_head)) {
+ take_write = true;
goto search_again_locked;
+ }
list_for_each_entry(iter, match_head, list) {
g = iter->g;
if (!g->node.active)
continue;
+
+ nested_down_write_ref_node(&g->node, FS_LOCK_PARENT);
+
err = insert_fte(g, fte);
if (err) {
+ up_write_ref_node(&g->node);
if (err == -ENOSPC)
continue;
- list_for_each_entry(iter, match_head, list)
- up_write_ref_node(&iter->g->node);
kmem_cache_free(steering->ftes_cache, fte);
return ERR_PTR(err);
}
nested_down_write_ref_node(&fte->node, FS_LOCK_CHILD);
- list_for_each_entry(iter, match_head, list)
- up_write_ref_node(&iter->g->node);
+ up_write_ref_node(&g->node);
rule = add_rule_fg(g, spec->match_value,
flow_act, dest, dest_num, fte);
up_write_ref_node(&fte->node);
@@ -1686,8 +1688,6 @@ try_add_to_existing_fg(struct mlx5_flow_table *ft,
}
rule = ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
out:
- list_for_each_entry(iter, match_head, list)
- up_write_ref_node(&iter->g->node);
kmem_cache_free(steering->ftes_cache, fte);
return rule;
}
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists