netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 04/11] tuntap: simplify error handling in tun_build

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180907101645-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
Date:   Fri, 7 Sep 2018 10:17:35 -0400
From:   "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To:     Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kvm@...r.kernel.org, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 04/11] tuntap: simplify error handling in
 tun_build_skb()

On Fri, Sep 07, 2018 at 11:22:00AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > @@ -1668,6 +1668,9 @@ static struct sk_buff *tun_build_skb(struct tun_struct *tun,
> > >   	if (copied != len)
> > >   		return ERR_PTR(-EFAULT);
> > > +	get_page(alloc_frag->page);
> > > +	alloc_frag->offset += buflen;
> > > +
> > This adds an atomic op on XDP_DROP which is a data path
> > operation for some workloads.
> 
> Yes, I have patch on top to amortize this, the idea is to have a very big
> refcount once after the frag was allocated and maintain a bias and decrease
> them all when allocating new frags.'

Why bother with refcounting for a drop though? It should be simple.

-- 
MST