[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180907042856.GB19965@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2018 05:28:56 +0100
From: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] get rid of tc_u_common ->rcu
On Thu, Sep 06, 2018 at 09:18:47PM -0700, Cong Wang wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 12:04 PM Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> >
> > From: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
> >
> > unused
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
> > ---
> > net/sched/cls_u32.c | 1 -
> > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/net/sched/cls_u32.c b/net/sched/cls_u32.c
> > index 8a1a573487bd..be9240ae1417 100644
> > --- a/net/sched/cls_u32.c
> > +++ b/net/sched/cls_u32.c
> > @@ -98,7 +98,6 @@ struct tc_u_common {
> > int refcnt;
> > struct idr handle_idr;
> > struct hlist_node hnode;
> > - struct rcu_head rcu;
> > };
>
> Just FYI:
>
> This was added when RCU was introduced to u32 fast path,
> it looks like on fast path we never touch tc_u_common, we
> only use tp->root, all the rest are slow paths with RTNL lock,
> so it is probably fine to just remove it rather than converting
> that kfree() to kfree_rcu().
*nod*
In any case, if u32_classify() grows that dereference, we can always
re-add ->rcu at the same time.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists