netdev - Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 0/4] net: batched receive in GRO path

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4ec5a3dc-0a41-7df1-9b10-781278c2ed61@solarflare.com>
Date:   Fri, 7 Sep 2018 11:51:48 +0100
From:   Edward Cree <ecree@...arflare.com>
To:     Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>, <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:     <linux-net-drivers@...arflare.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 0/4] net: batched receive in GRO path

On 07/09/18 03:32, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Your performance numbers are not convincing, since TCP stream test should
> get nominal GRO gains.
I'm not quite sure what you mean here, could you explain a bit more?

> Adding this complexity and icache pressure needs more experimental results.
>
> What about RPC workloads  (eg 100 concurrent netperf -t TCP_RR -- -r 8000,8000 )
I'll try that.  Any other tests that would be worthwhile?

-Ed