[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bb6d1de2-cb0c-73cb-e09a-a1a4c2357fb0@huawei.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2018 10:08:09 +0800
From: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
To: <davem@...emloft.net>, <h.morris@...coda.com>,
<alex.aring@...il.com>, <stefan@...enfreihafen.org>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-wpan@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] ieee802154: ca8210: Use kmemdup instead of
duplicating it in ca8210_test_int_driver_write
sorry, Pls ignore this duplicated patch.
On 2018/9/6 11:42, YueHaibing wrote:
> Replace calls to kmalloc followed by a memcpy with a direct call tokmemdup.
>
> Patch found using coccinelle.
>
> Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ieee802154/ca8210.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ieee802154/ca8210.c b/drivers/net/ieee802154/ca8210.c
> index 58299fb..e21279d 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ieee802154/ca8210.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ieee802154/ca8210.c
> @@ -634,10 +634,9 @@ static int ca8210_test_int_driver_write(
> for (i = 0; i < len; i++)
> dev_dbg(&priv->spi->dev, "%#03x\n", buf[i]);
>
> - fifo_buffer = kmalloc(len, GFP_KERNEL);
> + fifo_buffer = kmemdup(buf, len, GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!fifo_buffer)
> return -ENOMEM;
> - memcpy(fifo_buffer, buf, len);
> kfifo_in(&test->up_fifo, &fifo_buffer, 4);
> wake_up_interruptible(&priv->test.readq);
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists