[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANP3RGfGkH33mYDrenwWVkQ4uG4qyrddA+yvJ+t+=y6wGd7uDA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2018 02:07:12 -0700
From: Maciej Żenczykowski <maze@...gle.com>
To: Andre Naujoks <nautsch2@...il.com>
Cc: Linux NetDev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Kernel hackers <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, kuznet@....inr.ac.ru,
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Erik Kline <ek@...gle.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Shaohua Li <shli@...com>,
Kate Stewart <kstewart@...uxfoundation.org>,
Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@...b.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] ipv6: Add sockopt IPV6_MULTICAST_ALL analogue to IP_MULTICAST_ALL
Any reason not to use the same bit that is used by ipv4?
(as in add the setsockopt/getsockopt but just toggle the v4 bit)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists