lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 10 Sep 2018 09:45:00 +0000
From:   Fabrizio Castro <fabrizio.castro@...renesas.com>
To:     Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
CC:     Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@...ndegger.com>,
        Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>,
        Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        "linux-can@...r.kernel.org" <linux-can@...r.kernel.org>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
        Chris Paterson <Chris.Paterson2@...esas.com>,
        Biju Das <biju.das@...renesas.com>,
        Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/3][can-next] can: rcar_can: Fix erroneous registration

Hello Geert,

I am sorry for the late reply.
Thank you for your feedback.

> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3][can-next] can: rcar_can: Fix erroneous registration
>
> Hi Fabrizio,
>
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 3:08 PM Fabrizio Castro
> <fabrizio.castro@...renesas.com> wrote:
> > Assigning 2 to "renesas,can-clock-select" tricks the driver into
> > registering the CAN interface, even though we don't want that.
> > This patch fixes this problem and also allows for architectures
> > missing some of the clocks (e.g. RZ/G2) to behave as expected.
>
> I think the fix for the second issue is not needed (see my reply to the other
> patch).
>
> > Fixes: 862e2b6af9413b43 ("can: rcar_can: support all input clocks")
> > Signed-off-by: Fabrizio Castro <fabrizio.castro@...renesas.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Chris Paterson <Chris.Paterson2@...esas.com>
> > ---
> >
> > This patch applies on linux-can-next-for-4.19-20180727
> >
> >  drivers/net/can/rcar/rcar_can.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> >  1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/can/rcar/rcar_can.c b/drivers/net/can/rcar/rcar_can.c
> > index 11662f4..fbd9284 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/can/rcar/rcar_can.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/can/rcar/rcar_can.c
> > @@ -21,9 +21,13 @@
> >  #include <linux/clk.h>
> >  #include <linux/can/platform/rcar_can.h>
> >  #include <linux/of.h>
> > +#include <linux/of_device.h>
> >
> >  #define RCAR_CAN_DRV_NAME      "rcar_can"
> >
> > +#define RCAR_SUPPORTED_CLOCKS  (BIT(CLKR_CLKP1) | BIT(CLKR_CLKP2) | \
> > +                                BIT(CLKR_CLKEXT))
> > +
> >  /* Mailbox configuration:
> >   * mailbox 60 - 63 - Rx FIFO mailboxes
> >   * mailbox 56 - 59 - Tx FIFO mailboxes
> > @@ -745,10 +749,12 @@ static int rcar_can_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >         u32 clock_select = CLKR_CLKP1;
> >         int err = -ENODEV;
> >         int irq;
> > +       uintptr_t allowed_clks = RCAR_SUPPORTED_CLOCKS;
> >
> >         if (pdev->dev.of_node) {
> >                 of_property_read_u32(pdev->dev.of_node,
> >                                      "renesas,can-clock-select", &clock_select);
>
>
> > +               allowed_clks = (uintptr_t)of_device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev);
> >         } else {
> >                 pdata = dev_get_platdata(&pdev->dev);
> >                 if (!pdata) {
> > @@ -789,7 +795,7 @@ static int rcar_can_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >                 goto fail_clk;
> >         }
> >
> > -       if (clock_select >= ARRAY_SIZE(clock_names)) {
> > +       if (!(BIT(clock_select) & allowed_clks)) {
>
> Hence you can just use RCAR_SUPPORTED_CLOCKS directly,
> or better, just check clock_names[clock_select] != NULL, ...

I rather use RCAR_SUPPORTED_CLOCKS then, it's safer. I'll send a v2 for you to look at.

>
> >                 err = -EINVAL;
> >                 dev_err(&pdev->dev, "invalid CAN clock selected\n");
> >                 goto fail_clk;
> > @@ -899,13 +905,34 @@ static int __maybe_unused rcar_can_resume(struct device *dev)
> >  static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(rcar_can_pm_ops, rcar_can_suspend, rcar_can_resume);
> >
> >  static const struct of_device_id rcar_can_of_table[] __maybe_unused = {
> > -       { .compatible = "renesas,can-r8a7778" },
> > -       { .compatible = "renesas,can-r8a7779" },
> > -       { .compatible = "renesas,can-r8a7790" },
> > -       { .compatible = "renesas,can-r8a7791" },
> > -       { .compatible = "renesas,rcar-gen1-can" },
> > -       { .compatible = "renesas,rcar-gen2-can" },
> > -       { .compatible = "renesas,rcar-gen3-can" },
> > +       {
> > +               .compatible = "renesas,can-r8a7778",
> > +               .data = (void *)RCAR_SUPPORTED_CLOCKS,
> > +       },
> > +       {
> > +               .compatible = "renesas,can-r8a7779",
> > +               .data = (void *)RCAR_SUPPORTED_CLOCKS,
> > +       },
> > +       {
> > +               .compatible = "renesas,can-r8a7790",
> > +               .data = (void *)RCAR_SUPPORTED_CLOCKS,
> > +       },
> > +       {
> > +               .compatible = "renesas,can-r8a7791",
> > +               .data = (void *)RCAR_SUPPORTED_CLOCKS,
> > +       },
> > +       {
> > +               .compatible = "renesas,rcar-gen1-can",
> > +               .data = (void *)RCAR_SUPPORTED_CLOCKS,
> > +       },
> > +       {
> > +               .compatible = "renesas,rcar-gen2-can",
> > +               .data = (void *)RCAR_SUPPORTED_CLOCKS,
> > +       },
> > +       {
> > +               .compatible = "renesas,rcar-gen3-can",z
> > +               .data = (void *)RCAR_SUPPORTED_CLOCKS,
> > +       },
> >         { }
>
> ... and all of the above can dropped.
>
> >  };
> >  MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, rcar_can_of_table);
>
> BTW, why does the custom "renesas,can-clock-select" exist?
> If guess the standard "assigned-clock-parents" wasn't suitable because there's
> no actual defined clock for which you can change the parent?
>
> Why do you need manual selection? Can't the driver just pick the most suitable
> available clock, like other drivers (e.g. sh-sci) do?

Please have a look at 862e2b6af941 ("can: rcar_can: support all input clocks").
Maybe this could be improved in the future?

Thanks,
Fab

>
> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
>
>                         Geert
>
> --
> Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
>
> In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
> when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
>                                 -- Linus Torvalds



Renesas Electronics Europe Ltd, Dukes Meadow, Millboard Road, Bourne End, Buckinghamshire, SL8 5FH, UK. Registered in England & Wales under Registered No. 04586709.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ