netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v3 05/17] zinc: ChaCha20 x86

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 11 Sep 2018 23:27:26 +0200 (CEST)
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:     "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>
cc:     Samuel Neves <sneves@....uc.pt>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Andrew Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Jean-Philippe Aumasson <jeanphilippe.aumasson@...il.com>,
        Andy Polyakov <appro@...nssl.org>, mingo@...hat.com,
        X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
        Linux Crypto Mailing List <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 05/17] zinc: ChaCha20 x86_64 implementation

On Tue, 11 Sep 2018, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:

> Hey Thomas,
> 
> On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 3:09 AM Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
> > > This is covered on the 02/17 commit message, whose relevant paragraph follows:
> > Well, being only cc'ed on only half of the patches does not really help.
> 
> Sorry about that. I'm happy to Cc you on the whole series for next
> round if you want. Just let me know. In the meantime:

Na, all good. I'm fine with the answer and reviewing that ASM maze is way
over my limited crypto knowledge anyway. I definitely would enjoy
refreshing the math behind it, but that surely would be way outside of your
envisioned time frame for getting this merged :)

Thanks,

	tglx