[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <879245ec-fd99-3b7f-6fc2-2d8d25cf2c57@cumulusnetworks.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2018 20:39:34 -0600
From: David Ahern <dsa@...ulusnetworks.com>
To: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>
Cc: Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>,
network dev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
davem <davem@...emloft.net>,
Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] ipv6: use rt6_info members when dst is set in
rt6_fill_node
On 9/10/18 7:04 PM, Hangbin Liu wrote:
> diff --git a/net/ipv6/route.c b/net/ipv6/route.c
> index 18e00ce..62621b4 100644
> --- a/net/ipv6/route.c
> +++ b/net/ipv6/route.c
> @@ -998,6 +998,21 @@ static void ip6_rt_copy_init(struct rt6_info *rt, struct fib6_info *ort)
> rt->rt6i_prefsrc = ort->fib6_prefsrc;
> }
>
> +static void rt6_update_info(struct rt6_info *rt)
> +{
> + struct fib6_info *from;
> +
> + rcu_read_lock();
> + from = rcu_dereference(rt->from);
> + fib6_info_hold(from);
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> +
> + from->fib6_flags = rt->rt6i_flags;
> + from->fib6_nh.nh_gw = rt->rt6i_gateway;
As I mentioned on your last patch, redirects do *not* update fib
entries. Exceptions, yes, but not core data of a fib entry.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists