[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e1b9c36c-5459-a68e-e6fd-cca038e31d5f@cogentembedded.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2018 12:11:45 +0300
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
To: zhong jiang <zhongjiang@...wei.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuznet@....inr.ac.ru,
yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: ipv4: Use BUG_ON directly instead of a if condition
followed by BUG
On 9/11/2018 11:59 AM, zhong jiang wrote:
>>> The if condition can be removed if we use BUG_ON directly.
>>> The issule is detected with the help of Coccinelle.
>>
>> Issue?
>>
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: zhong jiang <zhongjiang@...wei.com>
>>> ---
>>> net/ipv4/tcp_input.c | 8 ++++----
>>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
>>> index 62508a2..893bde3 100644
>>> --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
>>> +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
>>> @@ -4934,8 +4934,8 @@ void tcp_rbtree_insert(struct rb_root *root, struct sk_buff *skb)
>>> BUG_ON(offset < 0);
>>> if (size > 0) {
>>> size = min(copy, size);
>>> - if (skb_copy_bits(skb, offset, skb_put(nskb, size), size))
>>> - BUG();
>>> + BUG(skb_copy_bits(skb, offset,
>>
>> You said BUG_ON()?
> Yep. Do you think that it is worthing to do
I think BUG() doesn't take parameters, BUG_ON() does. Have you tried to
build the kernel with your patch at all?
> Thanks,
> zhong jiang
[...]
MBR, Sergei
Powered by blists - more mailing lists