[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180913102859.kpeelj3mycjnyvhd@netronome.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2018 12:28:59 +0200
From: Simon Horman <simon.horman@...ronome.com>
To: zhong jiang <zhongjiang@...wei.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuznet@....inr.ac.ru,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] net: ipv4: Use BUG_ON directly instead of a if
condition followed by BUG
On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 09:13:13PM +0800, zhong jiang wrote:
> The if condition can be removed if we use BUG_ON directly.
> The issule is detected with the help of Coccinelle.
>
> Signed-off-by: zhong jiang <zhongjiang@...wei.com>
> ---
> net/ipv4/tcp_input.c | 8 ++++----
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
> index 62508a2..526c05e 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
> @@ -4934,8 +4934,8 @@ void tcp_rbtree_insert(struct rb_root *root, struct sk_buff *skb)
> BUG_ON(offset < 0);
> if (size > 0) {
> size = min(copy, size);
> - if (skb_copy_bits(skb, offset, skb_put(nskb, size), size))
> - BUG();
> + BUG_ON(skb_copy_bits(skb, offset,
> + skb_put(nskb, size), size));
Perhaps things have changed but it doesn't seem desirable to me to use
BUG_ON with statements that have side-effects in case at some point BUG_ON
gets compiled out.
> TCP_SKB_CB(nskb)->end_seq += size;
> copy -= size;
> start += size;
> @@ -5327,8 +5327,8 @@ static void tcp_urg(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb, const struct tcphdr *t
> /* Is the urgent pointer pointing into this packet? */
> if (ptr < skb->len) {
> u8 tmp;
> - if (skb_copy_bits(skb, ptr, &tmp, 1))
> - BUG();
> +
> + BUG_ON(skb_copy_bits(skb, ptr, &tmp, 1));
> tp->urg_data = TCP_URG_VALID | tmp;
> if (!sock_flag(sk, SOCK_DEAD))
> sk->sk_data_ready(sk);
> --
> 1.7.12.4
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists