netdev - Re: mlx5 driver loading failing on v4.19 / net-next / bpf-next

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CALzJLG_dB7W+2o9e+bXkr8eCACf0q6Ck2OQgEQg3fyOMxqXCSA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 14 Sep 2018 11:26:56 -0700
From:   Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@....mellanox.co.il>
To:     Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>
Cc:     Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>,
        Moshe Shemesh <moshe@...lanox.com>,
        Eli Cohen <eli@...lanox.com>,
        Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>,
        Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...lanox.com>,
        Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Eran Ben Elisha <eranbe@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: mlx5 driver loading failing on v4.19 / net-next / bpf-next

On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 1:52 AM, Jesper Dangaard Brouer
<brouer@...hat.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Sep 2018 01:22:15 -0700
> Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@....mellanox.co.il> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 11:36 PM, Jesper Dangaard Brouer
>> <brouer@...hat.com> wrote:
>> > On Thu, 13 Sep 2018 15:55:29 -0700
>> > Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 1:35 AM, Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...lanox.com> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > On 29/08/2018 6:05 PM, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Hi Saeed,
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I'm having issues loading mlx5 driver on v4.19 kernels (tested both
>> >> >> net-next and bpf-next), while kernel v4.18 seems to work.  It happens
>> >> >> with a Mellanox ConnectX-5 NIC (and also a CX4-Lx but I removed that
>> >> >> from the system now).
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >> > Hi Jesper,
>> >> >
>> >> > Thanks for your report!
>> >> >
>> >> > We are working to analyze and debug the issue.
>> >>
>> >> looks like serious issue to me... while no news in 2 weeks.
>> >> any update?
>> >
>> > Mellanox took it offlist, and Sep 6th found that this is a regression
>> > introduced by commit 269d26f47f6f ("net/mlx5: Reduce command polling
>> > interval"), but only if CONFIG_PREEMPT is on.
>> >
>> > I can confirm that reverting this commit fixed the issue (and not the
>> > firmware upgrade I also did).
>> >
>> > I think Moshe (Cc) is responsible for this case, and I expect to soon
>> > see a revert or alternative solution to this!?
>> >
>> > Thanks for the kick Alexei :-)
>>
>> Thanks you Alexei and Jesper for following up,
>> the fix is already being tested [1] and will be submitted tomorrow,
>> as Jesper pointed out the issue happens only with 269d26f47f6f
>> ("net/mlx5: Reduce command polling
>> interval"), and only if CONFIG_PREEMPT is on.
>> the only affected kernel is 4.19 which is not GA yet.
>>
>> [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/saeed/linux.git/commit/?h=net-mlx5
>
> Sound good.
>
> I will appreciate if you add a:
>
> Reported-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>
>

Of course i will add it, simply the patch was in my review queue
before your report :).

> --
> Best regards,
>   Jesper Dangaard Brouer
>   MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat
>   LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer