[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180915040246.22703-1-baijiaju1990@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2018 12:02:46 +0800
From: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@...il.com>
To: davem@...emloft.net, hayashi.kunihiko@...ionext.com,
yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com, robh@...nel.org, andrew@...n.ch
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH] net: socionext: Fix two sleep-in-atomic-context bugs in ave_rxfifo_reset()
The driver may sleep with holding a spinlock.
The function call paths (from bottom to top) in Linux-4.17 are:
[FUNC] usleep_range
drivers/net/ethernet/socionext/sni_ave.c, 892:
usleep_range in ave_rxfifo_reset
drivers/net/ethernet/socionext/sni_ave.c, 932:
ave_rxfifo_reset in ave_irq_handler
[FUNC] usleep_range
drivers/net/ethernet/socionext/sni_ave.c, 888:
usleep_range in ave_rxfifo_reset
drivers/net/ethernet/socionext/sni_ave.c, 932:
ave_rxfifo_reset in ave_irq_handler
To fix these bugs, usleep_range() is replaced with udelay().
These bugs are found by my static analysis tool DSAC.
Signed-off-by: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@...il.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/socionext/sni_ave.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/socionext/sni_ave.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/socionext/sni_ave.c
index f7ecceeb1e28..3c784a29ce0d 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/socionext/sni_ave.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/socionext/sni_ave.c
@@ -904,11 +904,11 @@ static void ave_rxfifo_reset(struct net_device *ndev)
/* assert reset */
writel(AVE_GRR_RXFFR, priv->base + AVE_GRR);
- usleep_range(40, 50);
+ udelay(50);
/* negate reset */
writel(0, priv->base + AVE_GRR);
- usleep_range(10, 20);
+ udelay(20);
/* negate interrupt status */
writel(AVE_GI_RXOVF, priv->base + AVE_GISR);
--
2.17.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists