[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180916.153235.727246482801051262.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2018 15:32:35 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: dcaratti@...hat.com
Cc: jhs@...atatu.com, xiyou.wangcong@...il.com, jiri@...nulli.us,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] net/sched: act_police: lockless data path
From: Davide Caratti <dcaratti@...hat.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2018 19:29:11 +0200
> the data path of 'police' action can be faster if we avoid using spinlocks:
> - patch 1 converts act_police to use per-cpu counters
> - patch 2 lets act_police use RCU to access its configuration data.
>
> test procedure (using pktgen from https://github.com/netoptimizer):
> # ip link add name eth1 type dummy
> # ip link set dev eth1 up
> # tc qdisc add dev eth1 clsact
> # tc filter add dev eth1 egress matchall action police \
> > rate 2gbit burst 100k conform-exceed pass/pass index 100
> # for c in 1 2 4; do
> > ./pktgen_bench_xmit_mode_queue_xmit.sh -v -s 64 -t $c -n 5000000 -i eth1
> > done
>
> test results (avg. pps/thread):
>
> $c | before patch | after patch | improvement
> ----+--------------+--------------+-------------
> 1 | 3518448 | 3591240 | irrelevant
> 2 | 3070065 | 3383393 | 10%
> 4 | 1540969 | 3238385 | 110%
Series applied.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists