[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <40088431-D4EE-4D1C-A369-2CE15F758483@amacapital.net>
Date:   Mon, 17 Sep 2018 07:55:56 -0700
From:   Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au
Cc:     luto@...nel.org, andrew@...n.ch, Jason@...c4.com,
        ebiggers@...nel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
        ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, sneves@....uc.pt,
        jeanphilippe.aumasson@...il.com, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 02/17] zinc: introduce minimal cryptography library
> On Sep 16, 2018, at 9:45 PM, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> 
> From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
> Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2018 21:09:11 -0700
> 
>> CRYPTO API
>> M:      Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
>> M:      "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
>> L:      linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org
>> 
>> Herbert hasn't replied to any of these submissions.  You're the other
>> maintainer :)
> 
> Herbert is the primary crypto maintainer, I haven't done a serious
> review of crypto code in ages.
> 
> So yes, Herbert review is what is important here.
Would you accept Ard’s (and/or Eric Biggers’, perhaps, as an alternative)?  Or, if you really want Herbert’s review, can you ask him to review it?  (Hi Herbert!)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
 
