[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPNVh5f3_GPpvV6nequZ8JNBhMVVOpEsJQ_XRfTN-+eaMPOWpw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2018 09:11:35 -0700
From: Peter Oskolkov <posk@...gle.com>
To: dsahern@...il.com
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net/ipv6: do not copy DST_NOCOUNT flag on rt init
On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 9:11 PM David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On 9/13/18 1:38 PM, Peter Oskolkov wrote:
>
> > diff --git a/net/ipv6/route.c b/net/ipv6/route.c
> > index 3eed045c65a5..a3902f805305 100644
> > --- a/net/ipv6/route.c
> > +++ b/net/ipv6/route.c
> > @@ -946,7 +946,7 @@ static void ip6_rt_init_dst_reject(struct rt6_info *rt, struct fib6_info *ort)
> >
> > static void ip6_rt_init_dst(struct rt6_info *rt, struct fib6_info *ort)
> > {
> > - rt->dst.flags |= fib6_info_dst_flags(ort);
> > + rt->dst.flags |= fib6_info_dst_flags(ort) & ~DST_NOCOUNT;
>
> I think my mistake is setting dst.flags in ip6_rt_init_dst. Flags
> argument is passed to ip6_dst_alloc which is always invoked before
> ip6_rt_copy_init is called which is the only caller of ip6_rt_init_dst.
ip6_rt_cache_alloc calls ip6_dst_alloc with zero as flags; and only
one flag is copied later (DST_HOST) outside of ip6_rt_init_dst().
If the flag assignment is completely removed from ip6_rt_init_dst(),
then DST_NOPOLICY flag will be lost.
Which may be OK, but is more than what this patch tries to solve (do not
copy DST_NOCOUNT flag).
>
> >
> > if (ort->fib6_flags & RTF_REJECT) {
> > ip6_rt_init_dst_reject(rt, ort);
> >
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists