[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANn89i+kg=tE9aRYoFb+9ws35CCJJQz9Yc9i=9w=vDj=Epvj=A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2018 14:13:25 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
To: songliubraving@...com
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...com>, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>,
michael.chan@...adcom.com, kernel-team <Kernel-team@...com>
Subject: Re: pegged softirq and NAPI race (?)
On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 1:37 PM Song Liu <songliubraving@...com> wrote:
>
> Looks like a patch like the following fixes the issue for ixgbe. But I
> cannot explain it yet.
>
> Does this ring a bell?
I dunno, it looks like the NIC is generating an interrupt while it should not,
and constantly sets NAPI_STATE_MISSED.
Or maybe we need to properly check napi_complete_done() return value.
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgb/ixgb_main.c
b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgb/ixgb_main.c
index d3e72d0f66ef428b08e4bd88508e05b734bc43a4..c4c565c982a98a5891603cedcdcb72dc1c401813
100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgb/ixgb_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgb/ixgb_main.c
@@ -1773,8 +1773,8 @@ ixgb_clean(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
ixgb_clean_rx_irq(adapter, &work_done, budget);
/* If budget not fully consumed, exit the polling mode */
- if (work_done < budget) {
- napi_complete_done(napi, work_done);
+ if (work_done < budget &&
+ napi_complete_done(napi, work_done)) {
if (!test_bit(__IXGB_DOWN, &adapter->flags))
ixgb_irq_enable(adapter);
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists