netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v5 20/20] net: WireGuard secure network tunnel

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 19 Sep 2018 01:34:11 +0200
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:     "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
        gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5 20/20] net: WireGuard secure network tunnel

> +#define push_rcu(stack, p, len) ({                                             \
> +		if (rcu_access_pointer(p)) {                                   \
> +			BUG_ON(len >= 128);                                    \
> +			stack[len++] = rcu_dereference_raw(p);                 \
> +		}                                                              \
> +		true;                                                          \
> +	})
> +static void root_free_rcu(struct rcu_head *rcu)
> +{
> +	struct allowedips_node *node, *stack[128] = {
> +		container_of(rcu, struct allowedips_node, rcu) };
> +	unsigned int len = 1;
> +
> +	while (len > 0 && (node = stack[--len]) &&
> +	       push_rcu(stack, node->bit[0], len) &&
> +	       push_rcu(stack, node->bit[1], len))
> +		kfree(node);
> +}

Hi Jason

I see this BUG_ON() is still here. It really needs to be removed. It
does not look like you need to crash the kernel here. Can you add in a
test of len >= 128, do a WARN and then return. I think you then leak
some memory, but i would much prefer that to a crashed machine.

     Andrew