[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180918000201.23609-3-saeedm@mellanox.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2018 17:02:00 -0700
From: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Alaa Hleihel <alaa@...lanox.com>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>
Subject: [net-next 2/3] net/mlx5: Check for SQ and not RQ state when modifying hairpin SQ
From: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@...lanox.com>
When modifying hairpin SQ, instead of checking if the next state equals
to MLX5_SQC_STATE_RDY, we compare it against the MLX5_RQC_STATE_RDY enum
value.
The code worked since both of MLX5_RQC_STATE_RDY and MLX5_SQC_STATE_RDY
have the same value today.
This patch fixes this issue.
Fixes: 18e568c390c6 ("net/mlx5: Hairpin pair core object setup")
Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@...lanox.com>
Reviewed-by: Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/transobj.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/transobj.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/transobj.c
index dae1c5c5d27c..d2f76070ea7c 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/transobj.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/transobj.c
@@ -509,7 +509,7 @@ static int mlx5_hairpin_modify_sq(struct mlx5_core_dev *peer_mdev, u32 sqn,
sqc = MLX5_ADDR_OF(modify_sq_in, in, ctx);
- if (next_state == MLX5_RQC_STATE_RDY) {
+ if (next_state == MLX5_SQC_STATE_RDY) {
MLX5_SET(sqc, sqc, hairpin_peer_rq, peer_rq);
MLX5_SET(sqc, sqc, hairpin_peer_vhca, peer_vhca);
}
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists