netdev - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <93982e9d-dc78-6423-bb9b-c5773d98e244@iogearbox.net>
Date:   Tue, 18 Sep 2018 10:44:06 +0200
From:   Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Vakul Garg <vakul.garg@....com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree

On 09/18/2018 02:11 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the net-next tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   tools/testing/selftests/net/tls.c
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   50c6b58a814d ("tls: fix currently broken MSG_PEEK behavior")
> 
> from the net tree and commit:
> 
>   c2ad647c6442 ("selftests/tls: Add test for recv(PEEK) spanning across multiple records")
> 
> from the net-next tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.

The test from 50c6b58a814d supersedes the one from c2ad647c6442 so the
recv_peek_large_buf_mult_recs could be removed; latter was also not working
correctly due to this bug.

Thanks,
Daniel